Wansink B, Johnson K A
Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Feb;39(2):371-4. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.104. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
Many eating studies in psychology, consumer behavior and marketing journals are dismissed, because they focus on how much one serves and not how much is eaten. We develop a means of estimating the percentage of self-served food that is consumed under various conditions. An aggregate analysis was conducted of studies where participants served themselves food and where actual intake was measured. Analyses explored what percentage of food was consumed depending on population, food and situational cues and generally showed that adults consistently consume the vast majority (91.7%) of what they serve themselves. This was higher for meals (92.8%) than for snacks (76.1%) and higher when a person was not distracted (97.1%) than when he or she was distracted (88.8%). The percentage eaten did not vary between lab (90.7%) and field settings (91.9%). Because many eating behavior studies outside of nutrition measure food selection, but not intake, the aggregate estimates presented in this research can enable obesity, nutrition and public health researchers to extrapolate how much may have been eaten in such studies. Doing so will extend their relevance to better understanding eating behavior and better developing solutions to overeating.
心理学、消费者行为学和营销期刊上的许多饮食研究都被忽视了,因为它们关注的是一个人盛了多少食物,而不是吃了多少。我们开发了一种方法来估计在各种情况下自助食物被吃掉的百分比。对参与者自助取食并测量实际摄入量的研究进行了综合分析。分析探讨了根据人群、食物和情境线索,有多少百分比的食物被吃掉,结果通常表明,成年人会持续吃掉他们所盛食物的绝大多数(91.7%)。正餐时这一比例(92.8%)高于零食(76.1%),一个人不被打扰时(97.1%)高于被打扰时(88.8%)。吃掉的百分比在实验室环境(90.7%)和实地环境(91.9%)之间没有差异。由于营养领域之外的许多饮食行为研究测量的是食物选择而非摄入量,本研究中给出的综合估计可以使肥胖、营养和公共卫生研究人员推断出此类研究中可能吃掉了多少食物。这样做将扩大这些研究的相关性,以更好地理解饮食行为,并更好地制定解决暴饮暴食问题的方案。