• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队搬运对工作要求、工作量及工人评估的影响:一项现场观察研究。

Evaluation of team lifting on work demands, workload and workers' evaluation: an observational field study.

作者信息

Visser Steven, van der Molen Henk F, Kuijer P Paul F M, Hoozemans Marco J M, Frings-Dresen Monique H W

机构信息

Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Arbouw, Harderwijk, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.009
PMID:24947000
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The objective of this study was to assess differences in work demands, energetic workload and workers' discomfort and physical effort in two regularly observable workdays in ironwork; one where loads up to 50kg were handled with two persons manually (T50) and one where loads up to 100kg were handled manually with four persons (T100). Differences between these typical workdays were assessed with an observational within-subject field study of 10 ironworkers. No significant differences were found for work demands, energetic workload or discomfort between T50 and T100 workdays. During team lifts, load mass exceeded 25kg per person in 57% (T50 workday) and 68% (T100 workday) of the lifts. Seven ironworkers rated team lifting with two persons as less physically demanding compared with lifting with four persons. When loads heavier than 25kg are lifted manually with a team, regulations of the maximum mass weight are frequently violated.

STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE

Loads heavier than 25kg are frequently lifted during concrete reinforcement work and should be lifted by a team of persons. However, the field study showed that loads above 25kg are most of the time not lifted with the appropriate number of workers. Therefore, loads heavier than 25kg should be lifted mechanically.

摘要

未标注

本研究的目的是评估在两个可定期观察的铁艺工作日中工作需求、精力负荷、工人不适和体力消耗的差异;一个工作日是两人手动搬运重达50千克的货物(T50),另一个工作日是四人手动搬运重达100千克的货物(T100)。通过对10名铁艺工人进行的一项观察性的受试者内现场研究,评估了这些典型工作日之间的差异。在T50和T100工作日之间,未发现工作需求、精力负荷或不适方面存在显著差异。在团队搬运过程中,57%(T50工作日)和68%(T100工作日)的搬运中每人的负载质量超过了25千克。七名铁艺工人认为两人团队搬运比四人团队搬运体力要求更低。当团队手动搬运超过25千克的重物时,经常会违反最大质量重量规定。

相关性声明

在混凝土钢筋作业中经常会搬运超过25千克的重物,应该由一组人员来搬运。然而,现场研究表明,超过25千克的重物大多数时候并没有由合适数量的工人来搬运。因此,超过25千克的重物应该用机械方式搬运。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of team lifting on work demands, workload and workers' evaluation: an observational field study.团队搬运对工作要求、工作量及工人评估的影响:一项现场观察研究。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
2
The evaluation of team lifting on physical work demands and workload in ironworkers.评估团队吊装对钢铁工人体力工作要求和工作量的影响。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:3771-3. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0003-3771.
3
Muscular mechanical energy expenditure as a process for detecting potential risks in manual materials handling.肌肉机械能消耗作为一种检测人工物料搬运潜在风险的过程。
J Biomech. 1991;24(3-4):191-203. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90177-o.
4
Does team lifting increase the variability in peak lumbar compression in ironworkers?团队抬举会增加钢铁工人腰椎峰值压缩的变异性吗?
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:4171-3. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0714-4171.
5
Workload assessment in building construction related activities in India.印度建筑施工相关活动中的工作量评估。
Appl Ergon. 2008 Nov;39(6):754-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.11.010. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
6
How Does Occupational Lifting Affect Ambulatory Blood Pressure, Relative Aerobic Workload and Level of Physical Activity?职业举重如何影响动态血压、相对有氧运动负荷和身体活动水平?
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Jun 6;67(5):559-571. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad009.
7
The Importance of Lifting Height and Load Mass for Muscular Workload during Supermarket Stocking: Cross-Sectional Field Study.在超市补货过程中,提升高度和负载质量对肌肉工作量的重要性:横截面现场研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 4;19(5):3030. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053030.
8
Estimation of physical workload of the low-back based on exposure variation analysis during a full working day among male blue-collar workers. Cross-sectional workplace study.基于男性蓝领工人全日工作期间暴露变化分析估算腰背体力负荷。横断面工作场所研究。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jul;70:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
9
A field evaluation method for assessing whole body biomechanical joint stress in manual lifting tasks.一种用于评估手动搬运任务中全身生物力学关节应力的现场评估方法。
Ind Health. 2006 Oct;44(4):604-12. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.44.604.
10
Gender influences on spine loads during complex lifting.性别对复杂提举过程中脊柱负荷的影响。
Spine J. 2003 Mar-Apr;3(2):93-9. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00570-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling heart rate of individual and team manual handling with one hand using generalized additive mixed models.使用广义加性混合模型对个体和团队单手手动操作的心率进行建模。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Feb 15;24(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02169-7.
2
The Sensor-Based Biomechanical Risk Assessment at the Base of the Need for Revising of Standards for Human Ergonomics.基于传感器的生物力学风险评估与人体工效学标准修订的必要性
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 10;20(20):5750. doi: 10.3390/s20205750.