Fisher J, Van-Dongen M, Sutherland R
Centre for Health Exercise and Sport Science, Southampton Solent University, Southampton, UK -
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015 Sep;55(9):899-904. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
Research considering combined vibration and strength training is extensive yet results are equivocal. However, to date there appears no research which has considered the combination of both direct vibration and whole-body vibration when used in an isometric deadlift position. The aim of this study was to compare groups performing isometric training with and without direct and whole-body vibration.
Twenty four participants (19-24 years) were randomly divided into: isometric training with vibration (ST+VT: N.=8), isometric training without vibration (ST: N.=8), and control (CON: N.=8). Within the training groups participants trained twice per week, for 6 weeks, performing 6-sets of maximal isometric deadlift contractions, increasing in duration from 30 seconds to 40 seconds (weeks 1-6). Hip and knee angle was maintained at 60° and 110°, respectively for both testing and training. Training sessions for ST+VT were identical to ST with the addition of a direct vibratory stimulus through hand-held straps and whole-body vibration via standing on vibration a platform. The amplitude remained constant (2 mm) throughout the intervention whilst the frequency increased from 35Hz to 50Hz. Pre- and post-test isometric strength was measured using an isometric deadlift dynamometer.
Results revealed significant increases in isometric strength for both ST+VT (P<0.001, 23.8%) and ST (P<0.001, 32.5%) compared to CON, with no significant differences between ST+VT and ST training groups.
The present study provides evidence to suggest that there are no greater gains to be incurred by the addition of a vibratory stimulus to traditional strength training.
关于振动与力量训练相结合的研究广泛,但结果并不明确。然而,迄今为止,似乎没有研究考虑过在等长硬拉姿势中使用直接振动和全身振动相结合的情况。本研究的目的是比较进行等长训练时有无直接振动和全身振动的两组情况。
24名参与者(19 - 24岁)被随机分为:振动等长训练组(ST + VT:N = 8)、无振动等长训练组(ST:N = 8)和对照组(CON:N = 8)。在训练组中,参与者每周训练两次,共6周,进行6组最大等长硬拉收缩,持续时间从30秒增加到40秒(第1 - 6周)。测试和训练时,髋部和膝盖角度分别保持在60°和110°。ST + VT组的训练课程与ST组相同,只是增加了通过手持绑带的直接振动刺激以及站在振动平台上的全身振动。在整个干预过程中,振幅保持恒定(2毫米),而频率从35赫兹增加到50赫兹。使用等长硬拉测力计测量测试前和测试后的等长力量。
结果显示,与CON组相比,ST + VT组(P < 0.001,23.8%)和ST组(P < 0.001,32.5%)的等长力量均显著增加,ST + VT组和ST训练组之间无显著差异。
本研究提供的证据表明,在传统力量训练中添加振动刺激不会带来更大的收益。