Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏复律除颤器植入后的不良事件:一项系统评价。

Adverse events following implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: a systematic review.

作者信息

Persson Rebecca, Earley Amy, Garlitski Ann C, Balk Ethan M, Uhlig Katrin

机构信息

Center for Clinical Evidence Research, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;40(2):191-205. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9913-z. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) prevent sudden cardiac death, but patients need to be counseled about potential harms. We summarized the evidence on adverse events from ICDs with a focus on ICD use for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 2002 through 2012 for reports of adverse events from ICDs implanted for primary prevention or mixed indications (primary and secondary prevention). Studies had to have ≥500 patients and specify patient numerators and denominators.

RESULTS

Data from 35 independent cohorts reported in 53 articles were included. Reports from one registry provided high quality evidence on adverse events during hospitalization for ICD implantation. Adverse events ranged from 2.8 to 3.6%. Serious adverse events ranged from 1.2 to 1.4%. The most frequent serious adverse events were pneumothorax (0.4-0.5%) and cardiac arrest (0.3%). The quality of the evidence for long-term adverse events was low. Frequency of adverse events post-hospitalization was variable, as was follow-up: device-related complications <0.1-6.4% (2-49 months), lead-related complications <0.1-3.9% (1.5-40 months), infection 0.2-3.7% (1.5-49 months), and thrombosis 0.2-2.9% (1.5-49 months). Evidence for inappropriate shock was of moderate quality with 3-21% of patients experiencing at least one inappropriate shock during 1 to 5 years of follow-up.

LIMITATIONS

The limitation of the evidence reviewed in this study is low quality evidence for adverse events post-hospitalization. Evidence is predominantly from mixed primary and secondary prevention populations.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital adverse events after ICD implantation are infrequent. The estimates for long-term adverse events are uncertain. Up to one-fifth of patients receive inappropriate shocks.

摘要

目的

植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)可预防心源性猝死,但需要向患者告知其潜在危害。我们总结了关于ICD不良事件的证据,重点关注ICD用于心源性猝死一级预防的情况。

方法

我们检索了2002年至2012年的MEDLINE和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,以获取有关为一级预防或混合适应证(一级和二级预防)植入ICD的不良事件报告。研究必须纳入≥500名患者,并明确患者的分子和分母。

结果

纳入了53篇文章中报道的35个独立队列的数据。一个注册机构的报告提供了关于ICD植入住院期间不良事件的高质量证据。不良事件发生率为2.8%至3.6%。严重不良事件发生率为1.2%至1.4%。最常见的严重不良事件是气胸(0.4 - 0.5%)和心脏骤停(0.3%)。长期不良事件的证据质量较低。出院后不良事件的发生率各不相同,随访情况也是如此:与设备相关的并发症<0.1 - 6.4%(2 - 49个月),与导线相关的并发症<0.1 - 3.9%(1.5 - 40个月),感染0.2 - 3.7%(1.5 - 49个月),血栓形成0.2 - 2.9%(1.5 - 49个月)。不适当电击的证据质量中等,3%至21%的患者在1至5年的随访期间至少经历过一次不适当电击。

局限性

本研究中所审查证据的局限性在于出院后不良事件的证据质量较低。证据主要来自一级和二级预防混合人群。

结论

ICD植入后的院内不良事件并不常见。长期不良事件的估计尚不确定。多达五分之一的患者会接受不适当电击。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验