• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在具有生存终点的临床试验中确定生物标志物定义的亚组效应的切点。

Identifying cut points for biomarker defined subset effects in clinical trials with survival endpoints.

作者信息

He Pei

机构信息

Amgen Inc. Global Biostatistical, Sciences 1120 Veterans Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA 94080, United States.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):333-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.005
PMID:24948401
Abstract

The advancements in biotechnology and genetics lead to an increasing research interest in personalized medicine, where a patient's genetic profile or biological traits contribute to choosing the most effective treatment for the patient. The process starts with finding a specific biomarker among all possible candidates that can best predict the treatment effect. After a biomarker is chosen, identifying a cut point of the biomarker value that splits the patients into treatment effective and non-effective subgroups becomes an important scientific problem. Numerous methods have been proposed to validate the predictive marker and select the appropriate cut points either prospectively or retrospectively using clinical trial data. In trials with survival outcomes, the current practice applies an interaction testing procedure and chooses the cut point that minimizes the p-values for the tests. Such method assumes independence between the baseline hazard and biomarker value. In reality, however, this assumption is often violated, as the chosen biomarker might also be prognostic in addition to its predictive nature for treatment effect. In this paper we propose a block-wise estimation and a sequential testing approach to identify the cut point in biomarkers that can group the patients into subsets based on their distinct treatment outcomes without assuming independence between the biomarker and baseline hazard. Numerical results based on simulated survival data show that the proposed method could pinpoint accurately the cut points in biomarker values that separate the patient subpopulations into subgroups with distinctive treatment outcomes.

摘要

生物技术和遗传学的进步引发了人们对个性化医疗的研究兴趣日益浓厚,在个性化医疗中,患者的基因特征或生物学特性有助于为患者选择最有效的治疗方法。这个过程始于在所有可能的候选物中找到一个能够最佳预测治疗效果的特定生物标志物。选择生物标志物后,确定生物标志物值的一个切点,将患者分为治疗有效和无效亚组,就成为一个重要的科学问题。已经提出了许多方法来验证预测标志物,并使用临床试验数据前瞻性或回顾性地选择合适的切点。在有生存结局的试验中,目前的做法是应用交互检验程序,并选择使检验的p值最小的切点。这种方法假定基线风险与生物标志物值之间相互独立。然而,在现实中,这个假设常常被违反,因为所选的生物标志物除了对治疗效果具有预测性外,可能还具有预后性。在本文中,我们提出了一种分块估计和序贯检验方法,以确定生物标志物中的切点,该切点可以根据患者不同的治疗结局将其分组,而无需假定生物标志物与基线风险之间相互独立。基于模拟生存数据的数值结果表明,所提出的方法能够准确地找出生物标志物值中的切点,这些切点将患者亚群分为具有不同治疗结局的亚组。

相似文献

1
Identifying cut points for biomarker defined subset effects in clinical trials with survival endpoints.在具有生存终点的临床试验中确定生物标志物定义的亚组效应的切点。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):333-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
2
Statistical inference on censored data for targeted clinical trials under enrichment design.
Pharm Stat. 2013 May-Jun;12(3):165-73. doi: 10.1002/pst.1568. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
3
Estimation of treatment effect in two-stage confirmatory oncology trials of personalized medicines.个性化药物两阶段确证性肿瘤学试验中治疗效果的评估。
Stat Med. 2017 May 30;36(12):1843-1861. doi: 10.1002/sim.7272. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
4
Subgroup identification for treatment selection in biomarker adaptive design.生物标志物适应性设计中用于治疗选择的亚组识别
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Dec 9;15:105. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0098-7.
5
Optimal survival time-related cut-point with censored data.带有删失数据的最优生存时间相关切点。
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 10;34(3):515-24. doi: 10.1002/sim.6360. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
6
Biomarker-adaptive threshold design: a procedure for evaluating treatment with possible biomarker-defined subset effect.生物标志物适应性阈值设计:一种评估具有可能由生物标志物定义的亚组效应的治疗方法。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jul 4;99(13):1036-43. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm022. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
7
A likelihood and resampling based approach to dichotomizing a continuous biomarker in medical research.一种基于似然性和重采样的方法,用于在医学研究中对连续生物标志物进行二分法划分。
J Biopharm Stat. 2013 May;23(3):637-47. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.756503.
8
Sample size and threshold estimation for clinical trials with predictive biomarkers.临床试验中预测性生物标志物的样本量和阈值估计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Nov;36(2):664-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
9
Strategies for power calculations in predictive biomarker studies in survival data.生存数据预测生物标志物研究中的功效计算策略。
Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 6;7(49):80373-80381. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12124.
10
Estimating the survival functions for right-censored and interval-censored data with piecewise constant hazard functions.用分段常数风险函数估计右删失和区间删失数据的生存函数。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jul;35(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological Insights on Biomarker-Based Patient Selection: A Review of Scientific Advice Procedures at the European Medicines Agency.基于生物标志物的患者选择的方法学见解:欧洲药品管理局科学建议程序综述
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 May;117(5):1226-1235. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3558. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
2
Clinical Neuropathology practice guide 5-2015: MGMT methylation pyrosequencing in glioblastoma: unresolved issues and open questions.《临床神经病理学实践指南5 - 2015:胶质母细胞瘤中MGMT甲基化焦磷酸测序:未解决的问题与开放性疑问》
Clin Neuropathol. 2015 Sep-Oct;34(5):250-7. doi: 10.5414/np300904.
3
Academic College of Emergency Experts in India's INDO-US Joint Working Group and OPUS12 Foundation Consensus Statement on Creating A Coordinated, Multi-Disciplinary, Patient-Centered, Global Point-of-Care Biomarker Discovery Network.
印度学术急诊专家参与的印美联合工作组及OPUS12基金会关于创建一个协调、多学科、以患者为中心的全球即时护理生物标志物发现网络的共识声明。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Jul;4(3):200-8. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.141398.