Suppr超能文献

政治因素对健康的影响:对巴基斯坦的启示。

Political determinants of Health: Lessons for Pakistan.

机构信息

Rashid Jooma, FRCS (Eng), FRCSEd (SN), Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Guido Sabatinelli, MD, WHO Representative in Tunisia, Tunis, Tunisia.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2014 May;30(3):457-61. doi: 10.12669/pjms.303.5487.

Abstract

There is much concern about the capacity of the health system of Pakistan to meet its goals and obligations. Historically, the political thrust has been absent from the health policy formulation and this is reflected in the low and stagnant public allocations to health. Successive political leaderships have averred from considering healthcare is a common good rather than a market commodity and health has not been recognized as a constitutional right. Over 120 of world's nation states have accepted health as a constitutional right but the 1973 Constitution of Pakistan does not mandate health or education as a fundamental right and the recently adopted 18th constitutional amendment missed the opportunity to extend access to primary health care as an obligation of the State. It is argued in this communication that missing from the calculations of policy formulation and agenda setting is the political benefits of providing health and other social services to underserved populations. Across the developing world, many examples are presented of governments undertaking progressive health reforms that bring services where none existed and subsequently reaping electoral benefit. The political determinant of healthcare will be realized when the political leaders of poorly performing countries can be convinced that embracing distributive policies and successfully bringing healthcare to the poor can be major factors in their re-elections.

摘要

人们非常关注巴基斯坦卫生系统实现其目标和履行其义务的能力。从历史上看,卫生政策的制定缺乏政治推动力,这反映在对卫生保健的公共拨款一直很低且停滞不前。历届政治领导层都回避将医疗保健视为共同利益,而不是市场商品,也没有将其视为一项宪法权利。世界上 120 多个国家的政府都承认健康是一项宪法权利,但 1973 年的《巴基斯坦宪法》并没有将健康或教育规定为基本权利,最近通过的第 18 次宪法修正案也没有抓住机会将获得初级保健作为国家的一项义务。在本通讯中认为,政策制定和议程设置的计算中缺失了为服务不足的人群提供健康和其他社会服务的政治利益。在整个发展中世界,许多政府正在进行渐进式卫生改革的例子被提出来,这些改革带来了以前不存在的服务,并随后获得了选举利益。当表现不佳的国家的政治领导人能够相信,采取分配性政策并成功地为穷人提供医疗保健,可以成为他们再次当选的主要因素时,医疗保健的政治决定因素就会显现出来。

相似文献

6
10
The New Right and family politics.新右派与家庭政治。
Econ Soc. 1992 May;21(2):93-128. doi: 10.1080/03085149200000006.

本文引用的文献

3
Development assistance for health: trends and prospects.卫生领域的发展援助:趋势与前景
Lancet. 2011 Jul 2;378(9785):8-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62356-2. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
6
Pakistan, politics and polio.巴基斯坦、政治与脊髓灰质炎
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Feb;88(2):159-60. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.066480. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
9
Confronting health disparities: Latin American social medicine in Venezuela.直面健康差距:委内瑞拉的拉丁美洲社会医学
Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):549-55. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.129130. Epub 2009 Jan 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验