Mathes Erin F, Frieden Ilona J, Cho Christine S, Boscardin Christy Kim
J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Jun;6(2):270-4. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00056.1.
Spaced education (SE) has shown promise as an instructional tool that uses repeated exposure to the same questions, but information on its utility in graduate medical education is limited, particularly in assessing knowledge gain with outcome measures that are different from repeat exposure to the intervention questions.
We examined whether SE is an effective instructional tool for pediatrics residents learning dermatology using an outcome measure that included both unique and isomorphic questions.
We randomized 81 pediatrics residents into 2 groups. Group A completed an SE course on atopic dermatitis and warts and molluscum. Group B completed an SE course on acne and melanocytic nevi. Each course consisted of 24 validated SE items (question, answer, and explanation) delivered 2 at a time in 2 e-mails per week. Both groups completed a pretest and posttest on all 4 topics. Each group served as the comparison for the other group.
Fifty residents (60%) completed the study. The course did not have a statistically significant effect on the posttest scores for either group. Overall, test scores were low. Eighty-eight percent of residents indicated that they would like to participate in future SE courses.
Using primarily novel posttest questions, this study did not demonstrate the significant knowledge gains that other investigators have found with SE.
间隔教育(SE)作为一种教学工具已显示出前景,它利用对相同问题的反复接触,但关于其在毕业后医学教育中的效用的信息有限,特别是在使用与反复接触干预问题不同的结果测量方法来评估知识获取方面。
我们使用包括独特问题和同构问题的结果测量方法,研究间隔教育对于儿科住院医师学习皮肤病学是否是一种有效的教学工具。
我们将81名儿科住院医师随机分为两组。A组完成了关于特应性皮炎、疣和传染性软疣的间隔教育课程。B组完成了关于痤疮和黑素细胞痣的间隔教育课程。每门课程由24个经过验证的间隔教育项目(问题、答案和解释)组成,每周通过两封电子邮件每次发送2个项目。两组都就所有4个主题完成了预测试和后测试。每组作为另一组的对照。
50名住院医师(60%)完成了研究。该课程对两组的后测试分数均无统计学上的显著影响。总体而言,测试分数较低。88%的住院医师表示他们愿意参加未来的间隔教育课程。
本研究主要使用新颖的后测试问题,并未证明间隔教育能像其他研究者所发现的那样带来显著的知识增长。