Creighton University School of Medicine and University of Arizona Cancer Center at St Joseph's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jul;15(8):799-808. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70244-X. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
Angiogenesis is a valid target in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Trebananib inhibits the binding of angiopoietins 1 and 2 to the Tie2 receptor, and thereby inhibits angiogenesis. We aimed to assess whether the addition of trebananib to single-agent weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer improved progression-free survival.
For this randomised, double-blind phase 3 study undertaken between Nov 10, 2010, and Nov 19, 2012, we enrolled women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer from 32 countries. Patient eligibility criteria included having been treated with three or fewer previous regimens, and a platinum-free interval of less than 12 months. We enrolled patients with a computerised interactive voice response system, and patients were randomly assigned using a permuted block method (block size of four) in a 1:1 ratio to receive weekly intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) plus either weekly masked intravenous placebo or trebananib (15 mg/kg). Patients were stratified on the basis of platinum-free interval (≥0 and ≤6 months vs >6 and ≤12 months), presence or absence of measurable disease, and region (North America, western Europe and Australia, or rest of world). The sponsor, investigators, site staff, and patients were masked to the treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01204749, and is no longer accruing patients.
919 patients were enrolled, of whom 461 were randomly assigned to the trebananib group and 458 to the placebo group. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the trebananib group than in the placebo group (7·2 months [5·8-7·4] vs 5·4 months [95% CI 4·3-5·5], respectively, hazard ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·57-0·77, p<0·0001). Incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was similar between treatment groups (244 [54%] of 452 patients in the placebo group vs 258 [56%] of 461 patients in the trebananib group). Trebananib was associated with more adverse event-related treatment discontinuations than was placebo (77 [17%] patients vs 27 [6%], respectively) and higher incidences of oedema (294 [64%] patients had any-grade oedema in the trebananib group vs 127 [28%] patients in the placebo group). Grade 3 or higher adverse events included ascites (34 [8%] in the placebo group vs 52 [11%] in the trebananib group), neutropenia (40 [9%] vs 26 [6%]), and abdominal pain (21 [5%] vs 22 [5%]). We recorded serious adverse events in 125 (28%) patients in the placebo group and 159 (34%) patients in the trebananib group. There was a difference of 2% or less in class-specific adverse events associated with anti-VEGF therapy (hypertension, proteinuria, wound-healing complications, thrombotic events, gastrointestinal perforations), except bleeding, which was more common in the placebo group than in the trebananib group (75 [17%] vs 46 [10%]).
Inhibition of angiopoietins 1 and 2 with trebananib provided a clinically meaningful prolongation in progression-free survival. This non-VEGF anti-angiogenesis option for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer should be investigated in other settings and in combination with additional agents. Although oedema was increased, typical anti-VEGF associated adverse events were not prominent.
Amgen.
血管生成是治疗上皮性卵巢癌的有效靶点。特凡赞抑制血管生成素 1 和 2 与 Tie2 受体的结合,从而抑制血管生成。我们旨在评估在复发性上皮性卵巢癌患者中,特凡赞联合单药每周紫杉醇治疗是否能改善无进展生存期。
这是一项于 2010 年 11 月 10 日至 2012 年 11 月 19 日进行的随机、双盲、3 期研究,纳入了来自 32 个国家的复发性上皮性卵巢癌患者。患者入选标准包括曾接受过 3 次或 3 次以下的治疗方案,以及无铂间期小于 12 个月。我们通过计算机交互语音应答系统纳入患者,患者采用随机分组方法(每组 4 个),以 1:1 的比例随机分为每周静脉注射紫杉醇(80mg/m2)联合每周静脉注射安慰剂或特凡赞(15mg/kg)。患者根据无铂间期(≥0 且≤6 个月 vs >6 且≤12 个月)、是否存在可测量的疾病以及所在地区(北美、西欧和澳大利亚,或世界其他地区)进行分层。赞助商、研究者、现场工作人员和患者对治疗分配情况进行了盲法处理。主要终点是意向治疗人群中的无进展生存期。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01204749,目前不再招募患者。
共纳入 919 例患者,其中 461 例随机分配至特凡赞组,458 例分配至安慰剂组。特凡赞组的中位无进展生存期明显长于安慰剂组(7.2 个月[5.8-7.4]vs 5.4 个月[95%CI 4.3-5.5],危险比 0.66,95%CI 0.57-0.77,p<0.0001)。两组治疗相关不良事件发生率相似(安慰剂组 452 例中有 244 例[54%],特凡赞组 461 例中有 258 例[56%])。特凡赞组与安慰剂组相比,因不良事件相关的治疗中断率更高(77 例[17%]vs 27 例[6%]),水肿发生率更高(特凡赞组 294 例[64%]患者出现任何级别水肿,安慰剂组 127 例[28%])。3 级或以上不良事件包括腹水(安慰剂组 34 例[8%],特凡赞组 52 例[11%])、中性粒细胞减少症(40 例[9%]vs 26 例[6%])和腹痛(21 例[5%]vs 22 例[5%])。安慰剂组和特凡赞组分别有 125 例(28%)和 159 例(34%)患者发生严重不良事件。与抗血管内皮生长因子治疗相关的特定不良事件(高血压、蛋白尿、伤口愈合并发症、血栓事件、胃肠道穿孔)的差异小于 2%,除了出血,安慰剂组比特凡赞组更常见(75 例[17%]vs 46 例[10%])。
血管生成素 1 和 2 的抑制作用使特凡赞治疗的复发性上皮性卵巢癌患者无进展生存期得到了显著延长。这种针对复发性上皮性卵巢癌的非血管内皮生长因子抗血管生成治疗方法应该在其他情况下进行研究,并与其他药物联合使用。尽管水肿增加,但特凡赞并不常见典型的抗血管内皮生长因子相关不良反应。
安进。