1 Research Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology (RDCEHP), Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, UK2 Natbrainlab, Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
3 Natbrainlab, Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK4 Inserm U1127; UPMC-Paris6, UMR_S 1127; CNRS UMR 7225, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.
Brain. 2014 Jul;137(Pt 7):2027-39. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu113.
Stroke-induced aphasia is associated with adverse effects on quality of life and the ability to return to work. For patients and clinicians the possibility of relying on valid predictors of recovery is an important asset in the clinical management of stroke-related impairment. Age, level of education, type and severity of initial symptoms are established predictors of recovery. However, anatomical predictors are still poorly understood. In this prospective longitudinal study, we intended to assess anatomical predictors of recovery derived from diffusion tractography of the perisylvian language networks. Our study focused on the arcuate fasciculus, a language pathway composed of three segments connecting Wernicke's to Broca's region (i.e. long segment), Wernicke's to Geschwind's region (i.e. posterior segment) and Broca's to Geschwind's region (i.e. anterior segment). In our study we were particularly interested in understanding how lateralization of the arcuate fasciculus impacts on severity of symptoms and their recovery. Sixteen patients (10 males; mean age 60 ± 17 years, range 28-87 years) underwent post stroke language assessment with the Revised Western Aphasia Battery and neuroimaging scanning within a fortnight from symptoms onset. Language assessment was repeated at 6 months. Backward elimination analysis identified a subset of predictor variables (age, sex, lesion size) to be introduced to further regression analyses. A hierarchical regression was conducted with the longitudinal aphasia severity as the dependent variable. The first model included the subset of variables as previously defined. The second model additionally introduced the left and right arcuate fasciculus (separate analysis for each segment). Lesion size was identified as the only independent predictor of longitudinal aphasia severity in the left hemisphere [beta = -0.630, t(-3.129), P = 0.011]. For the right hemisphere, age [beta = -0.678, t(-3.087), P = 0.010] and volume of the long segment of the arcuate fasciculus [beta = 0.730, t(2.732), P = 0.020] were predictors of longitudinal aphasia severity. Adding the volume of the right long segment to the first-level model increased the overall predictive power of the model from 28% to 57% [F(1,11) = 7.46, P = 0.02]. These findings suggest that different predictors of recovery are at play in the left and right hemisphere. The right hemisphere language network seems to be important in aphasia recovery after left hemispheric stroke.
脑卒中后失语症与生活质量和重返工作的能力的不良影响有关。对于患者和临床医生来说,依靠有效的恢复预测因子是脑卒中相关损伤临床管理的一个重要因素。年龄、教育水平、初始症状的类型和严重程度是恢复的既定预测因子。然而,解剖学预测因子仍知之甚少。在这项前瞻性纵向研究中,我们旨在评估基于大脑外侧裂语言网络的弥散张量成像的恢复的解剖学预测因子。我们的研究集中在弓状束上,这是一个由连接韦尼克区和布罗卡区的三个节段组成的语言通路(即长节段)、连接韦尼克区和 Geschwind 区的节段(即后节段)和连接布罗卡区和 Geschwind 区的节段(即前节段)。在我们的研究中,我们特别感兴趣的是了解弓状束的偏侧化如何影响症状的严重程度及其恢复。16 名患者(10 名男性;平均年龄 60±17 岁,范围 28-87 岁)在症状发作后两周内接受了脑卒中后语言评估(采用修订后的西方失语症成套测验)和神经影像学扫描。6 个月时进行语言评估的重复检查。向后消除分析确定了一组预测变量(年龄、性别、病变大小),将其引入进一步的回归分析。采用纵向失语症严重程度作为因变量进行层次回归分析。第一个模型包括之前定义的变量子集。第二个模型另外引入了左侧和右侧弓状束(每个节段分别进行分析)。病变大小被确定为左半球纵向失语症严重程度的唯一独立预测因子[β=-0.630,t(-3.129),P=0.011]。对于右半球,年龄[β=-0.678,t(-3.087),P=0.010]和弓状束长节段的体积[β=0.730,t(2.732),P=0.020]是纵向失语症严重程度的预测因子。将右侧长节段的体积添加到第一级模型中,增加了模型的总体预测能力,从 28%增加到 57%[F(1,11)=7.46,P=0.02]。这些发现表明,左半球和右半球的恢复有不同的预测因子。右侧半球语言网络在左侧半球脑卒中后失语症的恢复中似乎很重要。