Suppr超能文献

使用阿尼芬净作为替代标志物,通过采用美国临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的方法及解释标准,预测4290株念珠菌临床分离株对卡泊芬净的敏感性和耐药性。

Use of anidulafungin as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to caspofungin among 4,290 clinical isolates of Candida by using CLSI methods and interpretive criteria.

作者信息

Pfaller Michael A, Diekema Daniel J, Jones Ronald N, Castanheira Mariana

机构信息

JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Sep;52(9):3223-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00782-14. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

Abstract

This study addressed the application of anidulafungin as a surrogate marker to predict the susceptibility of Candida to caspofungin due to unacceptably high interlaboratory variation of caspofungin MIC values. CLSI reference broth microdilution methods and species-specific interpretive criteria were used to test 4,290 strains of Candida (eight species), including 71 strains with documented fks mutations. Caspofungin MIC values were compared with those of anidulafungin to determine the percentage of categorical agreement (CA) and very major (VME), major (ME), and minor error rates, as well as the ability to detect fks mutants. For all 4,290 isolates the CA was 97.1% (0.2% VME and ME, 2.5% minor errors) using anidulafungin as the surrogate. Among the 62 isolates of Candida albicans (4 isolates), C. tropicalis (5 isolates), C. krusei (4 isolates), C. kefyr (2 isolates), and C. glabrata (47 isolates) that were nonsusceptible (NS; either intermediate [I] or resistant [R]) to both caspofungin and anidulafungin, 52 (83.8%) contained a mutation in fks1 or fks2. Eight mutants of C. glabrata, two of C. albicans, and one each of C. tropicalis and C. krusei were classified as susceptible (S) to both antifungal agents. The remaining 7 mutants (2 C. albicans and 5 C. glabrata) were susceptible to one of the agents and either intermediate or resistant to the other. Using the epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) of 0.12 μg/ml for both caspofungin and anidulafungin to differentiate wild-type (WT) from non-WT strains of C. glabrata, 42 of the 55 (76.4%) C. glabrata mutants were non-WT and 8 of the 55 (14.5%) were WT for both agents (90.9% concordance). Anidulafungin can accurately serve as a surrogate marker to predict S and R of Candida to caspofungin.

摘要

由于卡泊芬净MIC值在实验室间存在高得不可接受的变异,本研究探讨了将阿尼芬净作为替代标志物来预测念珠菌对卡泊芬净的敏感性。采用CLSI参考肉汤微量稀释法和种属特异性解释标准对4290株念珠菌(8个种)进行检测,其中包括71株有记录的fks突变株。将卡泊芬净的MIC值与阿尼芬净的MIC值进行比较,以确定分类一致性(CA)百分比、极重大(VME)、重大(ME)和微小错误率,以及检测fks突变体的能力。对于所有4290株分离株,以阿尼芬净作为替代物时,CA为97.1%(VME和ME为0.2%,微小错误为2.5%)。在对卡泊芬净和阿尼芬净均不敏感(NS;中介[I]或耐药[R])的62株白色念珠菌(4株)、热带念珠菌(5株)、克柔念珠菌(4株)、解脂念珠菌(2株)和光滑念珠菌(47株)中,52株(83.8%)在fks1或fks2中存在突变。8株光滑念珠菌突变体、2株白色念珠菌突变体、1株热带念珠菌突变体和1株克柔念珠菌突变体对两种抗真菌药物均被分类为敏感(S)。其余7株突变体(2株白色念珠菌和5株光滑念珠菌)对其中一种药物敏感,对另一种药物则为中介或耐药。使用卡泊芬净和阿尼芬净的流行病学临界值(ECV)0.12μg/ml来区分光滑念珠菌的野生型(WT)和非WT菌株,55株光滑念珠菌突变体中有42株(76.4%)对两种药物均为非WT,55株中有8株(14.5%)对两种药物均为WT(一致性为90.9%)。阿尼芬净可准确地作为预测念珠菌对卡泊芬净敏感性和耐药性的替代标志物。

相似文献

4
Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for the echinocandins and Candida spp.
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):52-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01590-09. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
6
Echinocandin susceptibility testing of Candida isolates collected during a 1-year period in Sweden.
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jul;49(7):2516-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00201-11. Epub 2011 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing fungemias: the results of a prospective and international study.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Aug 6;69(8):e0035825. doi: 10.1128/aac.00358-25. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
3
: A Systematic Review of a Globally Emerging Fungal Pathogen in Africa.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 27;11(6):ofad681. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad681. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Antifungal Resistance in Pathogenic Species.
Cells. 2023 Nov 19;12(22):2655. doi: 10.3390/cells12222655.
6
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: A Primer for Clinicians.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 9;8(11):ofab444. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab444. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Antifungal Resistance of Candida auris Isolates from Bloodstream Infections, South Africa.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Aug 17;65(9):e0051721. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00517-21.
8
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Current Approaches.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020 Apr 29;33(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00069-19. Print 2020 Jun 17.
10
Analysis of antifungal resistance genes in Candida albicans and Candida glabrata using next generation sequencing.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210397. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

3
Frequency of fks mutations among Candida glabrata isolates from a 10-year global collection of bloodstream infection isolates.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(1):577-80. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01674-13. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
6
Caspofungin MICs correlate with treatment outcomes among patients with Candida glabrata invasive candidiasis and prior echinocandin exposure.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Aug;57(8):3528-35. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00136-13. Epub 2013 May 13.
9
ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Dec;18 Suppl 7:19-37. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12039.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验