Haidari A M, Zaidi S, Gul R
Ghazanfar Institute of Health Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Department of Community Health Science, Women and Child Health Division, Karachi, Pakistan.
East Mediterr Health J. 2014 Jun 9;20(5):300-8.
This study explored the readiness of stakeholders in Afghanistan for sustaining delivery of the Basic Package of Health Services (BPHS) without external technical and financial assistance. A stakeholder analysis was applied using qualitative methods. Fifteen stakeholders were purposively drawn from the Afghanistan ministries of public health and finance, political representatives, development partners, nonprofit organizations and public health experts. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with the stakeholders and desk review of pertinent documents. We found that sustainability of the BPHS in Afghanistan is questionable as stakeholders are suboptimally organized to come up with effective alternatives. Uneven ownership and divisive positioning are bottlenecks to the evolution of a realistic continuation plan. Those with the most significant influence are lukewarm, while those who are most supportive have the least influence. Sustainability needs to be tackled at the start in designing the BPHS rather than in the wake of eventual donor withdrawal.
本研究探讨了阿富汗利益相关者在没有外部技术和财政援助的情况下维持基本卫生服务包(BPHS)提供的准备情况。采用定性方法进行了利益相关者分析。从阿富汗公共卫生部和财政部、政治代表、发展伙伴、非营利组织和公共卫生专家中特意挑选了15名利益相关者。通过对利益相关者的深入访谈和对相关文件的案头审查收集数据。我们发现,阿富汗基本卫生服务包的可持续性存在疑问,因为利益相关者的组织不够理想,无法提出有效的替代方案。不均衡的所有权和分裂的定位是制定切实可行的延续计划的瓶颈。最有影响力的人态度冷淡,而最支持的人影响力最小。可持续性问题需要在设计基本卫生服务包之初就加以解决,而不是在捐助者最终撤出之后。