• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国新医改如何促进利益博弈均衡?——基于博弈演化与仿真分析

How Can China's New Health Care Reform Promote the Balance of Interest Game?-Based on Game Evolution and Simulation Analysis.

作者信息

Gong Hanxiang, Wang Xi, Zhang Tao, Li Jinghua, Chen Baoxin

机构信息

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, People's Republic of China.

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Aug 7;16:1435-1454. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S422296. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S422296
PMID:37575683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10422683/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The new round of medical reform is a significant exploration of reform in the public service sector in China. Health insurance regulatory departments, medical institutions, and patients, as critical stakeholders in China's medical reform, play a crucial role in the success of the reform through their strategic interactions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Starting from the perspective of bounded rationality, applies evolutionary game theory to establish an evolutionary game model for the collaborative governance of health insurance regulatory departments, medical institutions, and patients and analyzes the stability of each party's strategy and the sensitivity of parameters in the tripartite game system.

RESULTS

The study shows that an equilibrium point will be formed when medical institutions provide reasonable treatment, patients choose to accept treatment, and health insurance regulatory departments adopt a lenient regulatory strategy, maximizing the interests of all parties involved in the game. Factors such as the benefits of unreasonable treatment by medical institutions, fines, and regulatory costs impact the decision-making of health insurance regulatory departments. To maximize social welfare, health insurance regulatory departments should reform payment methods, adjust medical service behaviors of medical institutions, and guide the rational allocation of medical resources; the government should increase subsidies for the operation of medical institutions and the intensity of penalties; regulatory departments should reduce regulatory costs and introduce third-party forces to strengthen health insurance supervision further.

CONCLUSION

The research findings of this paper will provide valuable insights into some countries' medical and health reform.

摘要

目的

新一轮医改是中国公共服务领域改革的一次重大探索。医疗保险监管部门、医疗机构和患者作为中国医改中的关键利益相关者,通过其战略互动在改革成功中发挥着至关重要的作用。

患者与方法

从有限理性的角度出发,应用演化博弈理论建立医疗保险监管部门、医疗机构和患者协同治理的演化博弈模型,并分析三方博弈系统中各方策略的稳定性及参数的敏感性。

结果

研究表明,当医疗机构提供合理治疗、患者选择接受治疗、医疗保险监管部门采取宽松监管策略时,将形成一个均衡点,使博弈各方的利益最大化。医疗机构不合理治疗的收益、罚款、监管成本等因素影响医疗保险监管部门的决策。为使社会福利最大化,医疗保险监管部门应改革支付方式,调整医疗机构的医疗服务行为,引导医疗资源合理配置;政府应增加对医疗机构运营的补贴和处罚力度;监管部门应降低监管成本,引入第三方力量进一步加强医保监管。

结论

本文的研究结果将为一些国家的医疗卫生改革提供有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/5d975e751931/RMHP-16-1435-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/252240647fec/RMHP-16-1435-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/67a166366c56/RMHP-16-1435-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/4ada716ebefc/RMHP-16-1435-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/91a1366f41e3/RMHP-16-1435-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/f8ebe36f60f5/RMHP-16-1435-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/5b9533985e00/RMHP-16-1435-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/8977919884d3/RMHP-16-1435-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/d3f3024fbdb6/RMHP-16-1435-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/97c394b28d05/RMHP-16-1435-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/714e8b38d6dc/RMHP-16-1435-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/8ce65edaaef0/RMHP-16-1435-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/5d975e751931/RMHP-16-1435-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/252240647fec/RMHP-16-1435-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/67a166366c56/RMHP-16-1435-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/4ada716ebefc/RMHP-16-1435-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/91a1366f41e3/RMHP-16-1435-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/f8ebe36f60f5/RMHP-16-1435-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/5b9533985e00/RMHP-16-1435-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/8977919884d3/RMHP-16-1435-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/d3f3024fbdb6/RMHP-16-1435-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/97c394b28d05/RMHP-16-1435-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/714e8b38d6dc/RMHP-16-1435-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/8ce65edaaef0/RMHP-16-1435-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/889e/10422683/5d975e751931/RMHP-16-1435-g0012.jpg

相似文献

1
How Can China's New Health Care Reform Promote the Balance of Interest Game?-Based on Game Evolution and Simulation Analysis.中国新医改如何促进利益博弈均衡?——基于博弈演化与仿真分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Aug 7;16:1435-1454. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S422296. eCollection 2023.
2
Game-theoretic analysis of governance and corruption in China's pharmaceutical industry.中国制药行业治理与腐败问题的博弈论分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 14;11:1439864. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1439864. eCollection 2024.
3
Research on the Formation Mechanism of Health Insurance Fraud in China: From the Perspective of the Tripartite Evolutionary Game.中国健康保险欺诈形成机制研究:基于三方演化博弈视角。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;10:930120. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.930120. eCollection 2022.
4
How to promote the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system: A tripartite evolutionary game theory perspective.如何推动分级诊疗制度:三方演化博弈理论视角
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 5;13:1081562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1081562. eCollection 2022.
5
Medical Insurance Information Systems in China: Mixed Methods Study.中国医疗保险信息系统:混合方法研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Sep 1;8(9):e18780. doi: 10.2196/18780.
6
Evolutionary Game Analysis of Behavior Strategies of Multiple Stakeholders in an Elderly Care Service System.养老服务系统中多方利益主体行为策略的演化博弈分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(5):4263. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054263.
7
The challenge of healthcare big data to China's commercial health insurance industry: evaluation and recommendations.医疗大数据对中国商业健康保险行业的挑战:评估与建议。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):1189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08574-2.
8
A tripartite evolutionary game study on green governance in China's coating industry.中国涂料行业绿色治理的三方演化博弈研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):61161-61177. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20220-2. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
9
Allocation strategy of medical supplies during a public health emergency: a tripartite evolutionary game perspective.公共卫生突发事件下的医疗物资调配策略:三方演化博弈视角
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 13;13(1):9571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36000-y.
10
Evolutionary game analysis of rural public-private partnership older adult care project in the context of population aging in China.中国人口老龄化背景下农村公私合作伙伴关系养老项目的演化博弈分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 23;11:1110082. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1110082. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-medical linkage in China: trend evolution and obstacle identification.中国的三医联动:趋势演变与障碍识别
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12650-8.
2
Collaborative Governance Strategies for Fever Clinics: A Multi-Scenario Evolutionary Game Analysis.发热门诊协同治理策略:多情景演化博弈分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Feb 18;18:517-536. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S497125. eCollection 2025.
3
The cross-regional settlement methods in hospitals and the treatment-seeking behavior of patients with malignant tumors in China: an evolutionary game model.

本文引用的文献

1
How to promote the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system: A tripartite evolutionary game theory perspective.如何推动分级诊疗制度:三方演化博弈理论视角
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 5;13:1081562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1081562. eCollection 2022.
2
Factors Influencing Adoption and Use of Telemedicine Services in Rural Areas of China: Mixed Methods Study.影响中国农村地区远程医疗服务采用和使用的因素:混合方法研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Dec 23;8(12):e40771. doi: 10.2196/40771.
3
Ten years of China's new healthcare reform: a longitudinal study on changes in health resources.
中国医院跨区域结算方式与恶性肿瘤患者就医行为:一个演化博弈模型
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 17;12:1427164. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1427164. eCollection 2024.
4
Equity and Prediction of Bed Allocation of the Department of Stomatology in Chinese Hospitals.中国医院口腔科床位分配的公平性与预测
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Jun 4;17:1465-1476. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S461085. eCollection 2024.
5
Human Resources Allocation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China.中国疾病预防控制中心的人力资源配置
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Feb 17;17:341-353. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S452475. eCollection 2024.
十年中国新医改:卫生资源变化的纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 13;21(1):2272. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12248-9.
4
Systematic Review of the Effect of a Zero-Markup Policy for Essential Drugs on Healthcare Costs and Utilization in China, 2015-2021.2015 - 2021年中国基本药物零加成政策对医疗成本和利用影响的系统评价
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 22;8:618046. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.618046. eCollection 2021.
5
Challenges in establishing a graded diagnosis and treatment system in China.中国建立分级诊疗制度面临的挑战。
Fam Pract. 2022 Jan 19;39(1):214-216. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab089.
6
Impact of China's zero mark-up drug policy on drug cost of NCDs' outpatients: an interrupted time series analysis.中国药品零加成政策对非传染性疾病门诊患者药品费用的影响:一项中断时间序列分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06414-3.
7
Trend and equity of general practitioners' allocation in China based on the data from 2012-2017.基于 2012-2017 年数据的中国全科医生配置的趋势和公平性研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Feb 15;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00561-8.
8
Job satisfaction among primary care physicians in western China.中国西部基层医生的工作满意度。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Oct 25;21(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01292-w.
9
Regional Heterogeneity of Application and Effect of Telemedicine in the Primary Care Centres in Rural China.中国农村基层医疗中心远程医疗的应用和效果的地域差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 24;17(12):4531. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124531.
10
Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations.中国基层医疗保健的质量:挑战与建议。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 6;395(10239):1802-1812. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30122-7.