Amlie Einar, Havelin Leif I, Furnes Ove, Baste Valborg, Nordsletten Lars, Hovik Oystein, Dimmen Sigbjorn
Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital , Orthopaedic Department, Oslo.
Acta Orthop. 2014 Sep;85(5):463-9. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.934183. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
The surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often based on surgeon preference and local traditions. The anterior muscle-sparing approach has recently gained popularity in Europe. We tested the hypothesis that patient satisfaction, pain, function, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after THA is not related to the surgical approach.
1,476 patients identified through the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register were sent questionnaires 1-3 years after undergoing THA in the period from January 2008 to June 2010. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the hip disability osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), visual analog scales (VAS) addressing pain and satisfaction, and questions about complications. 1,273 patients completed the questionnaires and were included in the analysis.
Adjusted HOOS scores for pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL), sport/recreation, and quality of life were significantly worse (p < 0.001 to p = 0.03) for the lateral approach than for the anterior approach and the posterolateral approach (mean differences: 3.2-5.0). These results were related to more patient-reported limping with the lateral approach than with the anterior and posterolateral approaches (25% vs. 12% and 13%, respectively; p < 0.001).
Patients operated with the lateral approach reported worse outcomes 1-3 years after THA surgery. Self-reported limping occurred twice as often in patients who underwent THA with a lateral approach than in those who underwent THA with an anterior or posterolateral approach. There were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes after THA between those who underwent THA with a posterolateral approach and those who underwent THA with an anterior approach.
全髋关节置换术(THA)的手术入路通常基于外科医生的偏好和当地传统。前侧肌肉保留入路最近在欧洲受到欢迎。我们检验了这样一个假设,即THA术后患者的满意度、疼痛、功能及健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)与手术入路无关。
通过挪威关节置换登记处确定的1476例患者在2008年1月至2010年6月期间接受THA手术1至3年后收到问卷调查。患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)包括髋关节残疾骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、健康相关生活质量(EQ-5D-3L)、针对疼痛和满意度的视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及关于并发症的问题。1273例患者完成了问卷调查并纳入分析。
外侧入路组在疼痛、其他症状、日常生活活动(ADL)、运动/娱乐及生活质量方面的校正HOOS评分显著低于前侧入路组和后外侧入路组(p<0.001至p=0.03)(平均差异:3.2-5.0)。这些结果与外侧入路组患者报告的跛行情况比前侧入路组和后外侧入路组更多有关(分别为25% vs. 12%和13%;p<0.001)。
接受外侧入路手术的患者在THA术后1至3年报告的结局较差。接受THA外侧入路手术的患者自我报告的跛行发生率是接受前侧或后外侧入路手术患者的两倍。接受THA后外侧入路手术的患者与接受THA前侧入路手术的患者在THA术后患者报告的结局方面无显著差异。