Cicciu Marco, Bramanti Ennio, Matacena Giada, Guglielmino Eugenio, Risitano Giacomo
Department of Human Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina ME, IT.
Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina ME, IT.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Apr 15;7(4):817-25. eCollection 2014.
Prosthetic rehabilitation of partial or total edentulous patients is today a challenge for clinicians and dental practitioners. The application of dental implants in order to recover areas of missing teeth is going to be a predictable technique, however some important points about the implant angulation, the stress distribution over the bone tissue and prosthetic components should be well investigated for having final long term clinical results. Two different system of the prosthesis fixation are commonly used. The screw retained crown and the cemented retained one. All of the two restoration techniques give to the clinicians several advantages and some disadvantages. Aim of this work is to evaluate all the mechanical features of each system, through engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses. The FEM is today a useful tool for the prediction of stress effect upon material and biomaterial under load or strengths. Specifically three different area has been evaluated through this study: the dental crown with the bone interface; the passant screw connection area; the occlusal surface of the two different type of crown. The elastic features of the materials used in the study have been taken from recent literature data. Results revealed an adequate response for both type of prostheses, although cemented retained one showed better results over the occlusal area.
如今,为部分或全部无牙患者进行修复性康复治疗,对临床医生和牙科从业者来说是一项挑战。应用牙种植体来恢复缺牙区域将成为一项可预测的技术,然而,关于种植体角度、骨组织和修复部件上的应力分布等一些要点,为了获得最终长期的临床效果,仍需进行充分研究。通常使用两种不同的修复体固定系统。螺丝固位冠和粘结固位冠。这两种修复技术都给临床医生带来了一些优点和缺点。这项工作的目的是通过有限元法(FEM)和冯·米塞斯分析等工程研究系统,评估每个系统的所有力学特性。如今,有限元法是预测载荷或强度作用下材料和生物材料应力效应的有用工具。具体而言,通过本研究评估了三个不同区域:牙冠与骨界面;贯穿螺丝连接区域;两种不同类型牙冠的咬合面。研究中使用材料的弹性特性取自近期文献数据。结果显示两种类型的修复体都有足够的反应,尽管粘结固位冠在咬合区域表现出更好的结果。