• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙种植体的牙冠模块设计优化:有限元分析和体内研究。

Crestal module design optimization of dental implants: finite element analysis and in vivo studies.

机构信息

National Institute of Bioengineering (INABIO), Universidad Central de Venezuela, c/ Miguel Otero Silva s/n, Caracas, Venezuela.

Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Av. Eduard Maristany 10-14, 08019, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019 Jul 25;30(8):90. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6291-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10856-019-6291-1
PMID:31346767
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of Bone Level dental implants with four different neck designs in contact with cortical bone. Numerical simulations were performed using a Finite Element Method (FEM) based-model. In order to verify the FEM model, the in silico results were compared with the results obtained from histological analysis performed in an in vivo study with New Zealand rabbits. FEM was performed using a computerized 3D model of Bone Level dental implants inserted in the lower jaw bone with an applied axial load of 100 N. The analysis was performed using four different implant neck designs: even surfaced, screwed, three-ring design and four-ring design. Interface are of bone growth was evaluated by analyzing the Bone-Implant-Contact (BIC) parameter obtained from in vivo histological process and analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Bone Level implants were inserted in the rabbit tibia, placing two implants per tibia. The BIC was evaluated after three and six weeks of implantation. FEM studies showed that the three-ring design presented lower values of stress distribution compared to the other studied designs. The lower levels of mechanical stress were then correlated with the in vivo studies, showing that the three-ring design presented the highest BIC value after 3 and 6 weeks of implantation. In silico and in vivo results both concluded that the implants with three-ring neck design presented the best biomechanical and histological behavior in terms of new bone formation, enhanced mechanical stability and optimum osseointegration.

摘要

本研究旨在评估四种不同颈部设计的骨水平种植体与皮质骨接触时的生物力学行为。使用基于有限元方法(FEM)的模型进行数值模拟。为了验证 FEM 模型,将计算机模拟结果与在新西兰兔体内研究中进行的组织学分析结果进行了比较。使用计算机化的下颌骨中插入的骨水平种植体的三维模型进行 FEM,施加 100N 的轴向载荷。分析使用了四种不同的种植体颈部设计:光滑表面、螺旋、三环设计和四环设计。通过分析从体内组织学过程中获得的骨-种植体接触(BIC)参数来评估骨生长界面,并用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行分析。将骨水平种植体插入兔胫骨中,每根胫骨放置两个种植体。在植入后 3 周和 6 周评估 BIC。FEM 研究表明,三环设计的应力分布值低于其他研究设计。然后,较低的机械应力水平与体内研究相关,表明三环设计在植入后 3 周和 6 周时具有最高的 BIC 值。计算机模拟和体内研究都得出结论,三环颈部设计的种植体在新骨形成、增强机械稳定性和最佳骨整合方面表现出最佳的生物力学和组织学行为。

相似文献

1
Crestal module design optimization of dental implants: finite element analysis and in vivo studies.牙种植体的牙冠模块设计优化:有限元分析和体内研究。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019 Jul 25;30(8):90. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6291-1.
2
Influence of Bone-Level Dental Implants Placement and of Cortical Thickness on Osseointegration: In Silico and In Vivo Analyses.骨水平牙种植体植入及皮质骨厚度对骨整合的影响:计算机模拟与体内分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 16;11(4):1027. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041027.
3
Effects of a calcium phosphate coating on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in a rabbit model.钙磷酸盐涂层对兔模型中种植体骨整合的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jul;22(7):760-766. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02056.x. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
4
The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.通过比较圆柱形、根尖锥形、颈部锥形和可扩张型种植体,对骨质疏松颌骨功能状态下模拟种植体进行生物力学分析:三维有限元分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;69(7):e273-81. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
5
Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.翻制及酸蚀螺旋型种植体的初期稳定性:一项在兔体内的去除扭矩及组织形态计量学研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):886-92.
6
The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.种植体直径和长度对与嵴顶骨几何形状相关的骨结合种植体应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Dec;100(6):422-31. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60259-0.
7
Evaluation of "all-on-four" concept and alternative designs with 3D finite element analysis method.用三维有限元分析方法评估“all-on-four”理念及替代设计。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Aug;16(4):501-10. doi: 10.1111/cid.12024. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
8
In vivo osteogenesis and in vitro Streptococcus mutans adherence: porous-surfaced cylindrical implants vs rough-surfaced threaded implants.体内成骨与体外变异链球菌黏附:多孔表面圆柱状种植体与粗糙表面螺纹状种植体的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):1630-8. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2747.
9
Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part II: a pilot study in dogs.种植体周围骨对不同水平植入种植体的反应:第二部分:犬的初步研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23(2):236-244. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02290.x. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
10
Hybrid micro/nanostructural surface offering improved stress distribution and enhanced osseointegration properties of the biomedical titanium implant.具有改善的应力分布和增强的生物医学钛植入物的骨整合性能的混合微/纳米结构表面。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Mar;79:173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.042. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on different complex macro designs in commercially available implants: An in-vitro study.市售种植体不同复杂宏观设计应力分布的三维有限元分析:一项体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Nov-Dec;14(6):761-766. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.10.003. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
2
Biomechanical Effects of Ti-Base Abutment Height on the Dental Implant System: A Finite Element Analysis.钛基台高度对牙种植体系统的生物力学影响:有限元分析
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Apr 11;15(4):101. doi: 10.3390/jfb15040101.
3
Comparative analysis of the mechanical limits of resistance in implant/abutment set of a new implant design: An in vitro study.

本文引用的文献

1
Dental Implant Surrounding Marginal Bone Level Evaluation: Platform Switching versus Platform Matching-One-Year Retrospective Study.种植体周围边缘骨水平评估:平台转换与平台匹配——一年回顾性研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7191534. doi: 10.1155/2017/7191534. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
2
FEM and Von Mises Analysis on Prosthetic Crowns Structural Elements: Evaluation of Different Applied Materials.人工牙冠结构元件的有限元法和冯·米塞斯分析:不同应用材料的评估
ScientificWorldJournal. 2017;2017:1029574. doi: 10.1155/2017/1029574. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
Three-dimensional evaluation of different prosthesis retention systems using finite element analysis and the Von Mises stress test.
新型种植体设计的种植体/基台连接体抗阻力机械极限的对比分析:一项体外研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280684. eCollection 2023.
4
Bacteriostatic Poly Ethylene Glycol Plasma Coatings for Orthodontic Titanium Mini-Implants.用于正畸微型钛种植体的抑菌聚乙二醇等离子涂层
Materials (Basel). 2022 Oct 25;15(21):7487. doi: 10.3390/ma15217487.
5
Influence of Bone-Level Dental Implants Placement and of Cortical Thickness on Osseointegration: In Silico and In Vivo Analyses.骨水平牙种植体植入及皮质骨厚度对骨整合的影响:计算机模拟与体内分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 16;11(4):1027. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041027.
6
Relevant Design Aspects to Improve the Stability of Titanium Dental Implants.提高钛牙种植体稳定性的相关设计方面
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 18;13(8):1910. doi: 10.3390/ma13081910.
使用有限元分析和冯·米塞斯应力测试对不同假体固位系统进行三维评估。
Minerva Stomatol. 2016 Dec;65(6):353-367. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
4
FEM Analysis of Mandibular Prosthetic Overdenture Supported by Dental Implants: Evaluation of Different Retention Methods.牙种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿的有限元分析:不同固位方法的评估
Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:943839. doi: 10.1155/2015/943839. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
5
The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.种植体螺纹设计对不同骨整合条件下各向异性骨应力分布的影响:有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1317-26. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4091. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
6
FEM and Von Mises analyses of different dental implant shapes for masticatory loading distribution.用于咀嚼负荷分布的不同牙种植体形状的有限元法和冯·米塞斯分析。
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2014 Dec 27;7(1):1-10. eCollection 2014 Jan-Mar.
7
FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.骨水泥固位与螺丝固位的牙种植单冠修复体的有限元分析
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Apr 15;7(4):817-25. eCollection 2014.
8
Dental Implant Macro-Design Features Can Impact the Dynamics of Osseointegration.牙种植体的宏观设计特征会影响骨结合的动态过程。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Aug;17(4):639-45. doi: 10.1111/cid.12178. Epub 2013 Nov 17.
9
Influence of Micro Threads Alteration on Osseointegration and Primary Stability of Implants: An FEA and In Vivo Analysis in Rabbits.微螺纹改变对种植体骨整合和初期稳定性的影响:兔的有限元分析及体内分析
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jun;17(3):562-9. doi: 10.1111/cid.12143. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
10
Decontamination of dental implant surface in peri-implantitis treatment: a literature review.种植体周围炎治疗中种植体表面的去污:文献综述。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Nov 1;18(6):e869-76. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19420.