Verdecchia Paolo, Angeli Fabio, Lip Gregory Y H, Reboldi Gianpaolo
Department of Medicine, Hospital of Assisi, Assisi, Italy.
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Pathophysiology, University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 23;9(6):e100478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100478. eCollection 2014.
Edoxaban recently proved non-inferior to warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). We conducted an imputed-placebo analysis with estimates of the proportion of warfarin effect preserved by each non vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and indirect comparisons between edoxaban and different NOACs.
We performed a literature search (up to January 2014), clinical trials registers, conference proceedings, and websites of regulatory agencies. We selected non-inferiority randomised controlled phase III trials of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban compared with adjusted-dose warfarin in non-valvular AF. Compared to imputed placebo, all NOACs reduced the risk of stroke (ORs between 0.24 and 0.42, all p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (ORs between 0.55 and 0.59, all p<0.05). Edoxaban 30 mg and 60 mg preserved 87% and 112%, respectively, of the protective effect of warfarin on stroke, and 133% and 121%, respectively, of the protective effect of warfarin on all-cause mortality. The risk of primary outcome (stroke/systemic embolism), all strokes and ischemic strokes was significantly higher with edoxaban 30 mg than dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban. There were no significant differences between edoxaban 60 mg and other NOACs for all efficacy outcomes except stroke, which was higher with edoxaban 60 mg than dabigatran 150 mg. The risk of major bleedings was lower with edoxaban 30 mg than any other NOAC, odds ratios (ORs) ranging between 0.45 and 0.67 (all p<0.001).
This study suggests that all NOACs preserve a substantial or even larger proportion of the protective warfarin effect on stroke and all-cause mortality. Edoxaban 30 mg is associated with a definitely lower risk of major bleedings than other NOACs. This is counterbalanced by a lower efficacy in the prevention of thromboembolism, although with a final benefit on all-cause mortality.
在预防非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者血栓栓塞方面,依度沙班最近被证明不劣于华法林。我们进行了一项虚拟安慰剂分析,估算了每种非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOAC)对华法林疗效的保留比例,并对依度沙班与不同NOAC进行了间接比较。
我们进行了文献检索(截至2014年1月)、临床试验注册、会议记录以及监管机构网站查询。我们选择了在非瓣膜性AF患者中与调整剂量华法林相比的达比加群、利伐沙班、阿哌沙班和依度沙班的非劣效性随机对照III期试验。与虚拟安慰剂相比,所有NOAC均降低了中风风险(OR值在0.24至0.42之间,所有p<0.001)和全因死亡率(OR值在0.55至0.59之间,所有p<0.05)。依度沙班30mg和60mg分别保留了华法林对中风保护作用的87%和112%,以及对华法林全因死亡率保护作用的133%和121%。依度沙班30mg组主要结局(中风/全身性栓塞)、所有中风和缺血性中风的风险显著高于达比加群150mg组和阿哌沙班组。除中风外,依度沙班60mg组与其他NOAC在所有疗效结局上无显著差异,依度沙班60mg组中风发生率高于达比加群150mg组。依度沙班30mg组大出血风险低于任何其他NOAC,比值比(OR值)在0.45至0.67之间(所有p<0.001)。
本研究表明,所有NOAC均保留了华法林对中风和全因死亡率的大部分甚至更大比例的保护作用。依度沙班30mg与其他NOAC相比,大出血风险明显更低。尽管在预防血栓栓塞方面疗效较低,但最终对全因死亡率有好处,这抵消了其低疗效的影响。