Hayes Spencer J, Roberts James W, Elliott Digby, Bennett Simon J
Brain and Behaviour Laboratory, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1641-53. doi: 10.1037/a0037200. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
The acquisition of sensorimotor parameters that control goal-directed motor behaviors occurs by observing another person in the absence of efferent and afferent motor signals. This is observational practice. During such observation, biological motion properties associated with the observed person are coded into a representation that controls motor learning. Understanding the underlying processes, specifically associated with coding biological motion, has theoretical and practical significance. Here, we examined the following questions. Experiment 1: Are the underlying velocity characteristics associated with observed biological motion kinematics imitated? Experiment 2: Is attention involved in imitating biological motion kinematics? Experiment 3: Can selective attention modulate how biological motion kinematics are imitated/represented? To this end, participants practiced by observing a model performing a movement sequence that contained typical or atypical biological motion kinematics. The differences in kinematics were designed to dissociate the movement constraints of the task and the anatomical constraints of the observer. This way, we examined whether novel motor behaviors are acquired by adopting prototypical movements or coding biological motion. The kinematic analyses indicated the timing and spatial position of peak velocity were represented. Using a dual-task protocol, we attenuated the coding of biological motion kinematics (Experiment 2) and augmented coding using a selective attention protocol (Experiment 3). Findings indicated that velocity characteristics of biological motion kinematics are coded during observational practice, most likely through bottom-up sensorimotor processes. By modulating motion coding using 2 attentional protocols, we showed that bottom-up processes are influenced by input modulation, which is consistent with top-down control during observational practice.
在没有传出和传入运动信号的情况下,通过观察他人来获取控制目标导向运动行为的感觉运动参数。这就是观察性练习。在这种观察过程中,与被观察个体相关的生物运动特性被编码成一种控制运动学习的表征。理解这些潜在过程,特别是与生物运动编码相关的过程,具有理论和实践意义。在此,我们研究了以下问题。实验1:与观察到的生物运动运动学相关的潜在速度特征是否会被模仿?实验2:模仿生物运动运动学时是否涉及注意力?实验3:选择性注意力能否调节生物运动运动学的模仿/表征方式?为此,参与者通过观察一个模型执行包含典型或非典型生物运动运动学的运动序列来进行练习。运动学上的差异旨在区分任务的运动约束和观察者的解剖学约束。通过这种方式,我们研究了新的运动行为是通过采用原型运动还是对生物运动进行编码来习得的。运动学分析表明,峰值速度的时间和空间位置得到了表征。我们使用双任务协议减弱了生物运动运动学的编码(实验2),并使用选择性注意力协议增强了编码(实验3)。研究结果表明,生物运动运动学的速度特征在观察性练习过程中被编码,很可能是通过自下而上的感觉运动过程。通过使用两种注意力协议调节运动编码,我们表明自下而上的过程受到输入调制的影响,这与观察性练习中的自上而下控制是一致的。