Roberts James W, Maiden James, Lawrence Gavin P
Psychology, Action and Learning of Movement Laboratory (PALM), School of Health Sciences, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK.
Brain and Behaviour Laboratory, Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences (RISES) Tom Reilly Building, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 5AF, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 2021 May;239(5):1479-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06060-5. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
The task constraints imposed upon a co-actor can often influence our own actions. Likewise, the observation of somebody else's movements can involuntarily contaminate the execution of our own movements. These joint action outcomes have rarely been considered in unison. The aim of the present study was to simultaneously examine the underlying processes contributing to joint action. We had pairs of participants work together to execute sequential aiming movements between two targets-the first person's movement was contingent upon the anticipation of the second person's movement (leader), while the second person's movement was contingent upon the direct observation of the first person's movement (follower). Participants executed separate blocks of two-target aiming movements under different contexts; that is, solely on their own using one (2T1L) and two (2T2L) of their upper limbs, or with another person (2T2P). The first movement segment generally indicated a more abrupt approach (shorter time after peak velocity, greater displacement and magnitude of peak velocity), which surprisingly coincided with lower spatial variability, for the 2T2P context. Meanwhile, the second segment indicated a similar kinematic profile as the first segment for the 2T2P context. The first movement of the leader appeared to accommodate the follower for their movement, while the second movement of the follower was primed by the observation of the leader's movement. These findings collectively advocate two distinct levels of joint action including the anticipation (top-down) and mapping (bottom-up) of other people's actions.
施加于协同行动者的任务限制常常会影响我们自己的行动。同样,观察他人的动作会不由自主地干扰我们自己动作的执行。这些联合行动的结果很少被同时考虑。本研究的目的是同时考察促成联合行动的潜在过程。我们让参与者两两合作,在两个目标之间执行连续的瞄准动作——第一个人的动作取决于对第二个人动作的预期(领导者),而第二个人的动作取决于对第一个人动作的直接观察(跟随者)。参与者在不同情境下执行两目标瞄准动作的不同组块;也就是说,仅靠自己使用一条(2T1L)和两条(2T2L)上肢,或者与另一个人一起(2T2P)。对于2T2P情境,第一个动作片段通常显示出更突然的接近方式(峰值速度后时间更短、位移更大以及峰值速度幅度更大),令人惊讶的是这与更低的空间变异性同时出现。同时,对于2T2P情境,第二个片段显示出与第一个片段相似的运动学特征。领导者的第一个动作似乎是为了适应跟随者的动作,而跟随者的第二个动作则是由对领导者动作的观察所引发。这些发现共同支持了联合行动的两个不同层次,包括对他人动作的预期(自上而下)和映射(自下而上)。