Department of Psychology.
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.
Psychol Aging. 2014 Jun;29(2):359-62. doi: 10.1037/a0036893.
One would be hard-pressed to find a human trait that is not heritable at least to some extent, and genetics have played an important role in behavioral science for more than half a century. With the advent of high-throughput molecular methods and the increasing availability of genomic analyses, genetics have acquired a firm foothold in public discourse. However, although the proliferation of genetic association studies and ever-expanding library of single-nucleotide polymorphisms have generated some fascinating results, they have thus far fallen short of delivering the anticipated dramatic breakthroughs. In this collection of eight articles, we present a spectrum of efforts aimed at finding more nuanced and meaningful ways of integrating genomic findings into the study of cognitive aging. The articles present examples of Mendelian randomization in the service of investigating difficult-to-manipulate biochemical properties of human participants. Furthermore, in an important step forward, they acknowledge the interactive effects of genes and physiological risk factors on age-related difference and change in cognitive performance, as well as the possibility of modifying the negative effect of genetic variants by lifestyle changes.
人们很难找到一种至少在某种程度上不具有遗传性的人类特征,而且遗传学在行为科学中已经发挥了半个多世纪的重要作用。随着高通量分子方法的出现和基因组分析的日益普及,遗传学已经在公众话语中站稳了脚跟。然而,尽管遗传关联研究的大量涌现和单核苷酸多态性不断增加的文库已经产生了一些有趣的结果,但迄今为止,它们仍未能实现预期的重大突破。在这组八篇文章中,我们展示了一系列旨在寻找更细致和更有意义的方法,将基因组研究结果整合到认知老化研究中的努力。这些文章提供了孟德尔随机化的例子,旨在研究人类参与者难以操纵的生化特性。此外,它们向前迈出了重要的一步,承认了基因和生理风险因素对认知表现的年龄相关差异和变化的相互作用,以及通过生活方式改变来改变遗传变异的负面影响的可能性。