• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“二人若不同心,岂能同行?”大鼠二元组中的空间行为。

"Shall two walk together except they be agreed?" Spatial behavior in rat dyads.

作者信息

Weiss Omri, Segev Elad, Eilam David

机构信息

Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, 69978, Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2015 Jan;18(1):39-51. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0775-7. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-014-0775-7
PMID:24958542
Abstract

When animals explore an unfamiliar environment, they gather information that enables them to form a cognitive representation of that environment and to use it subsequently in traveling there. In the present study, rats were tested in a large arena as singles, then in dyads, and finally, again as singles, in order to examine the effect of the social environment on exploration. Traveling in dyads facilitated exploration compared to the behavior of the same rats when they explored alone. Specifically, each rat in a dyad traveled a greater distance with higher velocity and took wider turns compared to its lone traveling. Moreover, rats in dyads spent a long time together, shared a home base, and when traveling in the same direction, one rat was leading the other. In addition to exploring the same locations, leaders explored more "private" locations, not visited by the other rat. Features of the dyad behavior were carried over to the behavior of the same rats when tested as individuals, after the dyad trial. Compared to singles, dyads represent the first step toward grouping, and it is suggested that the conspicuous change between the behavior of a rat as single compared to its behavior when in a dyad should be greater than any further changes that may occur in spatial cognitive behavior of triads, quartets, or larger groups. In other words, while the present changes in spatial cognition observed in dyads represent a small step toward grouping, they are a giant leap for the individual.

摘要

当动物探索一个陌生环境时,它们会收集信息,这些信息使它们能够形成对该环境的认知表征,并随后在前往该环境时加以利用。在本研究中,大鼠先单独在一个大竞技场中接受测试,然后成对接受测试,最后再次单独接受测试,以检验社会环境对探索的影响。与单独探索时相比,成对探索时大鼠的探索行为更活跃。具体而言,与单独行动时相比,成对的每只大鼠移动的距离更远、速度更快,转弯幅度更大。此外,成对的大鼠会长时间待在一起,共用一个大本营,并且在同向移动时,一只大鼠会带领另一只。除了探索相同的地点外,领头的大鼠还会探索更多另一只大鼠未去过的“私密”地点。成对行为的特征在成对试验后,当这些大鼠作为个体接受测试时,会延续到它们的个体行为中。与单独行动的大鼠相比,成对行动代表了向群体行为发展的第一步,并且有人提出,大鼠单独行动与成对行动时行为的显著变化,应该大于在三联体、四联体或更大群体的空间认知行为中可能发生的任何进一步变化。换句话说,虽然目前在成对行动中观察到的空间认知变化只是向群体行为迈出的一小步,但对个体来说却是巨大的飞跃。

相似文献

1
"Shall two walk together except they be agreed?" Spatial behavior in rat dyads.“二人若不同心,岂能同行?”大鼠二元组中的空间行为。
Anim Cogn. 2015 Jan;18(1):39-51. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0775-7. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
2
Social spatial cognition in rat tetrads: how they select their partners and their gathering places.大鼠四联体中的社会空间认知:它们如何选择伙伴和聚集地点。
Anim Cogn. 2017 May;20(3):409-418. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1063-5. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
3
Spatio-temporal organization during group formation in rats.大鼠群体形成过程中的时空组织
Anim Cogn. 2018 Jul;21(4):513-529. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1185-z. Epub 2018 May 2.
4
Traveling Companions Add Complexity and Hinder Performance in the Spatial Behavior of Rats.旅伴增加了大鼠空间行为的复杂性并阻碍其表现。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 4;11(1):e0146137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146137. eCollection 2016.
5
Social factors influence solo and rat dyads exploration of an unfamiliar open field.社会因素影响单独个体以及大鼠二元组对陌生开阔场地的探索。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):703-708. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01664-y. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
6
Of mice and men: building blocks in cognitive mapping.从老鼠到人:认知图式构建的基石。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Nov;47:393-409. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
7
A small step for rats alters spatial behavior: rats on a bi-level arena explore each level separately.大鼠的一小步改变空间行为:处于双层场地的大鼠分别探索每一层。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):655-666. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01710-9. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
8
On the border: perimeter patrolling as a transitional exploratory phase in a diurnal rodent, the fat sand rat (Psammomys obesus).在边界处:作为昼夜活动的啮齿动物肥沙鼠(Psammomys obesus)过渡性探索阶段的周边巡逻
Anim Cogn. 2008 Apr;11(2):311-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0119-y. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
9
Rats do not eat alone in public: Food-deprived rats socialize rather than competing for baits.大鼠不会在公共场合独自进食:饥饿的大鼠会社交而不是争抢食物。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 9;12(3):e0173302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173302. eCollection 2017.
10
Arena geometry and path shape: when rats travel in straight or in circuitous paths?竞技场几何形状和路径形状:当老鼠走直线还是走弯路?
Behav Brain Res. 2011 Dec 1;225(2):449-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.07.055. Epub 2011 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning Rat-Like Behavioral Interaction Using a Small-Scale Robotic Rat.使用小型机器人鼠学习类似大鼠的行为交互。
Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2023 Jun 19;4:0032. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0032. eCollection 2023.
2
Rodents Prefer Going Downhill All the Way (Gravitaxis) Instead of Taking an Uphill Task.啮齿动物更喜欢一路下坡(重力趋性),而不是承担上坡任务。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Jul 21;11(7):1090. doi: 10.3390/biology11071090.
3
Social factors influence solo and rat dyads exploration of an unfamiliar open field.社会因素影响单独个体以及大鼠二元组对陌生开阔场地的探索。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):703-708. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01664-y. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
4
Body language signals for rodent social communication.用于啮齿动物社会交流的肢体语言信号。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2021 Jun;68:91-106. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
5
Conspecific Presence Improves Episodic-Like Memory in Rats.同种个体的存在可改善大鼠的情景式记忆。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jan 15;14:572150. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.572150. eCollection 2020.
6
Social spatial cognition: social distance dynamics as an identifier of social interactions.社会空间认知:社会距离动态作为社会互动的标识符。
Anim Cogn. 2021 May;24(3):407-418. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01441-9. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
7
Volumetric spatial behaviour in rats reveals the anisotropic organisation of navigation.大鼠的容积空间行为揭示了导航的各向异性组织。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jan;24(1):133-163. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01432-w. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
Rats do not eat alone in public: Food-deprived rats socialize rather than competing for baits.大鼠不会在公共场合独自进食:饥饿的大鼠会社交而不是争抢食物。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 9;12(3):e0173302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173302. eCollection 2017.
9
Traveling Companions Add Complexity and Hinder Performance in the Spatial Behavior of Rats.旅伴增加了大鼠空间行为的复杂性并阻碍其表现。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 4;11(1):e0146137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146137. eCollection 2016.
10
Nucleus accumbens core and pathogenesis of compulsive checking.伏隔核核心与强迫检查行为的发病机制。
Behav Pharmacol. 2015 Feb;26(1-2):200-16. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000112.