Dorfman Alex, Nielbo Kristoffer Laigaard, Eilam David
Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, 69978, Israel.
Interacting Minds Center, Aarhus University, Nordre Ringgade 1, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 4;11(1):e0146137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146137. eCollection 2016.
We sought to uncover the impact of the social environment on the spatial behavior of rats. Food-deprived rats were trained in a spatial task of collecting food items from 16 equispaced objects. Following training, they were tested, first alone and then with a similarly-trained cage-mate. It was found that the presence of another rat substantially altered the rats' spatial behavior. Lone rats collected the food items faster while traveling a shorter distance, reflecting a higher efficiency of task completion. When accompanied by a partner, however, the rats traveled together, visiting the same set of objects in each trip with one of them leading. Whether alone or with a partner, rats continued to revisit the same objects; however, more such revisits occurred with a partner. We argue that revisiting objects is not necessarily an error, since returning to past places is an important aspect of rats' natural behavior. Revisiting an object following food depletion implies that searching for food was not the main driving force in the rats' spatial behavior. Specifically, despite food deprivation, rats were more attentive to one another than to the food. This could be adaptive, since foraging and feeding in groups is a way of poison avoidance in wild rats. Finally, the addition of a social component added complexity to the environment since the rats organized their spatial behavior in reference to one another in addition to their organization in the physical surrounding. Consequently, when tested with a partner, spatial behavior was less structured, less predictable and more chaotic.
我们试图揭示社会环境对大鼠空间行为的影响。将食物匮乏的大鼠训练完成一项从16个等间距物体中收集食物的空间任务。训练后,先单独对它们进行测试,然后与一只经过类似训练的同笼伙伴一起测试。结果发现,另一只大鼠的存在显著改变了大鼠的空间行为。单独的大鼠收集食物的速度更快,同时行进的距离更短,这反映出任务完成效率更高。然而,当有伙伴陪伴时,大鼠会一起行动,每次行程中访问相同的一组物体,其中一只大鼠带头。无论单独还是有伙伴陪伴,大鼠都会继续重访相同的物体;然而,有伙伴时这种重访发生得更多。我们认为重访物体不一定是错误,因为回到过去的地方是大鼠自然行为的一个重要方面。在食物耗尽后重访一个物体意味着寻找食物不是大鼠空间行为的主要驱动力。具体而言,尽管食物匮乏,但大鼠彼此之间的关注度高于对食物的关注度。这可能是适应性的,因为群体觅食和进食是野生大鼠避免中毒的一种方式。最后,加入社会因素增加了环境的复杂性,因为大鼠除了根据物理环境来组织空间行为外,还会参照彼此来组织空间行为。因此,当与伙伴一起测试时,空间行为的结构更少、更不可预测且更混乱。