Bianchi F, Rossi E A, Gomes R G, Sivieri K
Department of Food and Nutrition, Probiotics Research Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UNESP), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil
Department of Food and Nutrition, Probiotics Research Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UNESP), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Food Sci Technol Int. 2015 Sep;21(6):403-15. doi: 10.1177/1082013214540672. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
The aim of this study was to develop a potentially synbiotic beverage fermented with Lactobacillus casei LC-1 based on aqueous extracts of soy and quinoa with added fructooligosaccharides (FOS). Five formulations with differing proportions of soy and quinoa extracts were tested. The viability of the microorganism, the pH, and the acidity of all formulations were monitored until the 28th day of storage at 5 ℃. The chemical composition of the extracts and beverages and the rheological and sensory properties of the final products were analyzed. Although an increase in acidity and a decrease in pH were observed during the 28 days of storage, the viability of the probiotic microorganism was maintained at 10(8) CFU·mL(-1) in all formulated beverages throughout the storage period. An increase in viscosity and consistency in the formulations with higher concentrations of quinoa (F1 and F2) was observed. Formulation F4 (70% soy and 30% quinoa extracts) showed the least hysteresis. Formulations F4 and F5 (100% soy extract) had the best sensory acceptance while F4 resulted in the highest intention to purchase from a group of 80 volunteers. For chemical composition, F3 (50% soy and 50% quinoa extracts) and F4 showed the best results compared to similar fermented beverages. The formulation F4 was considered the best beverage overall.
本研究的目的是开发一种潜在的合生元饮料,该饮料以干酪乳杆菌LC-1发酵,以大豆和藜麦的水提取物为基础,并添加低聚果糖(FOS)。测试了五种不同比例大豆和藜麦提取物的配方。监测所有配方在5℃储存至第28天期间微生物的活力、pH值和酸度。分析了提取物和饮料的化学成分以及最终产品的流变学和感官特性。尽管在储存的28天内观察到酸度增加和pH值降低,但在整个储存期内,所有配方饮料中益生菌微生物的活力均保持在10(8) CFU·mL(-1)。观察到藜麦浓度较高的配方(F1和F2)的粘度和稠度增加。配方F4(70%大豆和30%藜麦提取物)的滞后现象最少。配方F4和F5(100%大豆提取物)的感官接受度最佳,而F4在80名志愿者群体中导致最高的购买意愿。在化学成分方面,与类似的发酵饮料相比,F3(50%大豆和50%藜麦提取物)和F4的结果最佳。总体而言,配方F4被认为是最佳饮料。