Schleef R R, Higgins D L, Pillemer E, Levitt L J
Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, California 94305.
J Clin Invest. 1989 May;83(5):1747-52. doi: 10.1172/JCI114076.
We evaluated an elderly patient with a lifelong history of severe bleeding after surgery or trauma and with evidence of persistent hyperfibrinolysis. Routine coagulation studies were normal. Serum plasminogen (40%, normal 72-128%) and alpha 2-antiplasmin (55%, normal 70-145%) activities were decreased. Euglobulin clot lysis was abnormally shortened (50 min) and normalized in vitro with epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA). The patient was treated with EACA with prompt cessation of bleeding. Patient tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) levels in serum were normal (4.7 ng/ml, control 3.5-7.2) as detected by a two-site immunoradiometric assay (IRMA). Patient fibrinolytic inhibitor activities were assessed by incubating 125I-labeled t-PA with either whole blood or serum followed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography to identify the resultant protease/protease inhibitor complexes. In comparison to blood samples obtained from normal donors, patient plasma and serum demonstrated reduced binding of a fast-acting plasminogen activator inhibitor to 125I-labeled t-PA. Immunoprecipitation experiments indicated diminished complex formation between type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) in patient serum and 125I-labeled t-PA. Low patient PAI-1 activity was confirmed in serum (0.36 U/ml, control 0.87-1.81; n = 3) and in platelet lysates using a functional IRMA to quantitate PAI-1 binding to immobilized t-PA. However, patient serum PAI-1 antigen was within the normal range when analyzed by IRMA (31.8 ng/ml, control 19.6-42.2); this result was confirmed in both serum and platelets by Western blot (n = 3). Mixing experiments using purified PAI-1 as well as patient and control sera did not show evidence for an inhibitor against PAI-1. We conclude that this patient's bleeding diathesis was due to hyperfibrinolysis and defective PAI-1. This patient provides the first demonstration of a link between decreased in vivo PAI-1 activity and disordered hemostasis, and supports a role for PAI-1 in control of vivo fibrinolysis.
我们评估了一位老年患者,该患者术后或外伤后有严重出血的终生病史,并有持续性高纤维蛋白溶解的证据。常规凝血研究正常。血清纤溶酶原活性(40%,正常为72 - 128%)和α2 - 抗纤溶酶活性(55%,正常为70 - 145%)降低。优球蛋白凝块溶解时间异常缩短(50分钟),用ε - 氨基己酸(EACA)体外可使其恢复正常。患者接受EACA治疗后出血迅速停止。通过双位点免疫放射分析(IRMA)检测,患者血清中的组织纤溶酶原激活物(t - PA)水平正常(4.7 ng/ml,对照为3.5 - 7.2)。通过将125I标记的t - PA与全血或血清孵育,随后进行SDS - PAGE和放射自显影以鉴定产生的蛋白酶/蛋白酶抑制剂复合物,来评估患者的纤维蛋白溶解抑制剂活性。与从正常供体获得的血样相比,患者的血浆和血清显示快速作用的纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂与125I标记的t - PA的结合减少。免疫沉淀实验表明患者血清中的1型纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂(PAI - 1)与125I标记的t - PA之间的复合物形成减少。使用功能性IRMA对固定化t - PA的PAI - 1结合进行定量,在血清(患者0.36 U/ml,对照0.87 - 1.81;n = 3)和血小板裂解物中证实了患者PAI - 1活性较低。然而,通过IRMA分析时患者血清PAI - 1抗原在正常范围内(31.8 ng/ml,对照19.6 - 42.2);通过蛋白质印迹法在血清和血小板中均证实了这一结果(n = 3)。使用纯化的PAI - 1以及患者和对照血清进行的混合实验未显示存在针对PAI - 1的抑制剂。我们得出结论,该患者的出血素质是由于高纤维蛋白溶解和PAI - 1缺陷所致。该患者首次证明了体内PAI - 1活性降低与止血紊乱之间的联系,并支持PAI - 1在体内纤维蛋白溶解控制中的作用。