• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加速有利于贫困人口的健康市场的发展。

Accelerating learning for pro-poor health markets.

作者信息

Bennett Sara, Lagomarsino Gina, Knezovich Jeffrey, Lucas Henry

机构信息

Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Global Health. 2014 Jun 24;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-54.

DOI:10.1186/1744-8603-10-54
PMID:24961671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4105125/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the rapid evolution of health markets, learning is key to promoting the identification and uptake of health market policies and practices that better serve the needs of the poor. However there are significant challenges to learning about health markets. We discuss the different forms that learning takes, from the development of codified scientific knowledge, through to experience-based learning, all in relationship to health markets.

DISCUSSION

Notable challenges to learning in health markets include the difficulty of acquiring data from private health care providers, designing evaluations that capture the complex dynamics present within health markets and developing communities of practice that encompass the diverse actors present within health markets, and building trust and mutual understanding across these groups. The paper proposes experimentation with country-specific market data platforms that can integrate relevant evidence from different data sources, and simultaneously exploring strategies to secure better information on private providers and health markets. Possible approaches to adapting evaluation designs so that they are better able to take account of different and changing contexts as well as producing real time findings are discussed. Finally capturing informal knowledge about health markets is key. Communities of practice that bridge different health market actors can help to share such experience-based knowledge and in so doing, may help to formalize it. More geographically-focused communities of practice are needed, and such communities may be supported by innovation brokers and/or be built around member-based organizations.

SUMMARY

Strategic investments in and support to learning about health markets can address some of the challenges experienced to-date, and accelerate learning that supports health markets that serve the poor.

摘要

背景

鉴于卫生市场的快速演变,学习对于推动识别和采用能更好满足贫困人口需求的卫生市场政策及实践至关重要。然而,了解卫生市场存在重大挑战。我们讨论了学习所采取的不同形式,从编纂科学知识的发展,到基于经验的学习,所有这些都与卫生市场相关。

讨论

卫生市场学习面临的显著挑战包括难以从私立医疗服务提供者获取数据、设计能捕捉卫生市场复杂动态的评估、发展涵盖卫生市场中不同行为者的实践社区,以及在这些群体之间建立信任和相互理解。本文提议对特定国家的市场数据平台进行试验,该平台可整合来自不同数据源的相关证据,同时探索获取有关私立提供者和卫生市场更好信息的策略。讨论了调整评估设计的可能方法,以便它们能更好地考虑不同且不断变化的背景,并产生实时结果。最后,获取有关卫生市场的非正式知识至关重要。连接不同卫生市场行为者的实践社区有助于分享此类基于经验的知识,这样做可能有助于将其形式化。需要更多以地理为重点的实践社区,此类社区可能由创新中介提供支持和/或围绕会员制组织建立。

总结

对卫生市场学习进行战略投资和支持可以应对迄今遇到的一些挑战,并加速有助于服务贫困人口的卫生市场的学习。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca04/4105125/9409d6d40604/1744-8603-10-54-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca04/4105125/9409d6d40604/1744-8603-10-54-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca04/4105125/9409d6d40604/1744-8603-10-54-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Accelerating learning for pro-poor health markets.加速有利于贫困人口的健康市场的发展。
Global Health. 2014 Jun 24;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-54.
2
Making health markets work better for poor people: the case of informal providers.使卫生市场更好地为贫困人口服务:非正规提供者的情况。
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Jul;26 Suppl 1:i45-52. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr025.
3
Innovation in regulation of rapidly changing health markets.快速变化的健康市场监管方面的创新。
Global Health. 2014 Jun 24;10:53. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-53.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Managing the health care market in developing countries: prospects and problems.发展中国家医疗保健市场的管理:前景与问题
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Sep;9(3):237-51. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.3.237.
7
Research approaches for improved pro-poor control of zoonoses.改善人畜共患病扶贫控制的研究方法。
Food Nutr Bull. 2007 Jun;28(2 Suppl):S345-56. doi: 10.1177/15648265070282S214.
8
Unfree markets: socially embedded informal health providers in northern Karnataka, India.非自由市场:印度卡纳塔克邦北部社会嵌入的非正式卫生提供者。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;96:297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.022. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

引用本文的文献

1
The Health Innovation Impact Checklist: a tool to improve the development and reporting of impact models for global health innovations.《健康创新影响清单》:用于改善全球健康创新影响模型开发和报告的工具。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2056312. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2056312.
2
exploring experiences of formal private for-profit health providers towards contribution to pro-poor access in post conflict Northern Uganda.探讨冲突后北乌干达营利性私立医疗机构对促进贫困人口获得医疗服务的贡献的经验。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1890929. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1890929.
3
Private retail drug shops: what they are, how they operate, and implications for health care delivery in rural Uganda.

本文引用的文献

1
Innovation in regulation of rapidly changing health markets.快速变化的健康市场监管方面的创新。
Global Health. 2014 Jun 24;10:53. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-53.
2
Evaluating health systems strengthening interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: are we asking the right questions?评估中低收入国家的卫生系统强化干预措施:我们提出的问题恰当吗?
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27 Suppl 4:iv9-19. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs086.
3
Expecting the unexpected: applying the Develop-Distort Dilemma to maximize positive market impacts in health.
私营零售药店:其概况、运营方式及对乌干达农村地区医疗服务的影响
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 9;18(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3343-z.
4
Assessing health program performance in low- and middle-income countries: building a feasible, credible, and comprehensive framework.评估低收入和中等收入国家的卫生项目绩效:构建一个可行、可信且全面的框架。
Global Health. 2015 Dec 21;11:51. doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0137-5.
5
An exploratory analysis of the nature of informal knowledge underlying theories of planned action used for public health oriented knowledge translation.对用于公共卫生导向知识转化的计划行为理论所蕴含的非正式知识本质的探索性分析。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 9;8:424. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1391-6.
6
The future of health markets.健康市场的未来。
Global Health. 2014 Jun 24;10:51. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-51.
意料之外的情况:应用发展-扭曲困境以最大限度地提高健康市场的积极影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27 Suppl 4:iv44-53. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs085.
4
A systematic review of simulated-patient methods used in community pharmacy to assess the provision of non-prescription medicines.一项关于社区药房中用于评估非处方药供应情况的模拟患者方法的系统评价。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2012 Oct;20(5):307-19. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00201.x. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
5
Knowledge translation of research findings.研究成果的知识转化。
Implement Sci. 2012 May 31;7:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-50.
6
Comparing private sector family planning services to government and NGO services in Ethiopia and Pakistan: how do social franchises compare across quality, equity and cost?比较埃塞俄比亚和巴基斯坦私营部门计划生育服务与政府和非政府组织服务:社会特许经营在质量、公平和成本方面如何进行比较?
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Jul;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i63-71. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr027.
7
Quality of private and public ambulatory health care in low and middle income countries: systematic review of comparative studies.中低收入国家私营和公营初级保健医疗质量:系统评价比较研究。
PLoS Med. 2011 Apr;8(4):e1000433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000433. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
8
Measuring impact in the Millennium Development Goal era and beyond: a new approach to large-scale effectiveness evaluations.衡量千年发展目标时代及以后的影响:一种大规模效果评估的新方法。
Lancet. 2011 Jan 1;377(9759):85-95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60810-0. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
9
Systematic review of public health branding.公共卫生品牌的系统评价。
J Health Commun. 2008 Dec;13(8):721-41. doi: 10.1080/10810730802487364.
10
The effectiveness of contracting-out primary health care services in developing countries: a review of the evidence.发展中国家初级卫生保健服务外包的成效:证据综述
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Jan;23(1):1-13. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czm042. Epub 2007 Nov 13.