Watanabe Masayuki, Mine Shinji, Yamada Kazuhiko, Shigaki Hironobu, Baba Yoshifumi, Yoshida Naoya, Kajiyama Kiyoshi, Yamamoto Noriko, Sano Takeshi, Baba Hideo
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan,
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;62(11):685-92. doi: 10.1007/s11748-014-0444-4. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
The aim of this study was to determine the significance of lymphadenectomy for recurrence after treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Short- and long-term outcomes of 24 patients who underwent lymphadenectomy for recurrence in 3 hospitals between April 2004 and March 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 17 cases with lymph node recurrence after esophagectomy (11 cervical, 4 mediastinal, and 2 abdominal node recurrences) and 7 cases with remnant or recurrent lymphatic diseases after definitive chemoradiotherapy (3 cervical, 1 mediastinal, and 3 abdominal node recurrences).
Three minor complications were observed among 24 patients and the median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days. The 3-year progression-free and overall survivals of patients who underwent secondary lymphadenectomy for recurrence after esophagectomy were 51.5 and 75.5 %, respectively. The overall survival of patients with cervical node recurrence was significantly better than that of patients with mediastinal or abdominal node recurrence in this group (P = 0.0097). The median progression-free and overall survivals of patients who underwent salvage lymphadenectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy were 2 and 15 months, respectively. Although only 1 patient experienced local recurrence after secondary lymphadenectomy, locoregional failures occurred in 6 of 7 patients who underwent salvage lymphadenectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Secondary or salvage lymphadenectomy can be performed safely in the selected patients. Secondary lymphadenectomy achieves locoregional disease control and results in a favorable long-term outcome, particularly for cervical node recurrence. Further large-scale cohort studies are needed to determine the prognostic significance of salvage lymphadenectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy.
本研究旨在确定淋巴结清扫术对食管鳞状细胞癌治疗后复发的意义。
回顾性分析2004年4月至2013年3月期间在3家医院因复发而接受淋巴结清扫术的24例患者的短期和长期结局。其中17例为食管癌切除术后淋巴结复发(11例为颈部、4例为纵隔、2例为腹部淋巴结复发),7例为根治性放化疗后残留或复发性淋巴疾病(3例为颈部、1例为纵隔、3例为腹部淋巴结复发)。
24例患者中观察到3例轻微并发症,术后中位住院时间为7天。食管癌切除术后因复发接受二次淋巴结清扫术患者的3年无进展生存率和总生存率分别为51.5%和75.5%。该组中颈部淋巴结复发患者的总生存率显著高于纵隔或腹部淋巴结复发患者(P = 0.0097)。根治性放化疗后接受挽救性淋巴结清扫术患者的中位无进展生存期和总生存期分别为2个月和15个月。虽然二次淋巴结清扫术后仅1例患者出现局部复发,但根治性放化疗后接受挽救性淋巴结清扫术的7例患者中有6例出现局部区域失败。
在选定的患者中可以安全地进行二次或挽救性淋巴结清扫术。二次淋巴结清扫术可实现局部区域疾病控制并带来良好的长期结局,尤其是对于颈部淋巴结复发。需要进一步的大规模队列研究来确定根治性放化疗后挽救性淋巴结清扫术的预后意义。