Parvez Elena, Hodgson Nicole, Cornacchi Sylvie D, Ramsaroop Amanda, Gordon Maggie, Farrokhyar Forough, Porter Geoffrey, Quan May Lynn, Wright Francis, Lovrics Peter J
Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Breast J. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):481-8. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12299. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
Although breast conservation surgery (BCS) is commonly performed, several aspects of the procedure remain controversial. We undertook a cross-sectional survey to compare Canadian (CDN) and American (AM) general surgeons' reported BCS practice patterns to better understand the cross-border differences in early-stage breast cancer surgery care. A modified Dillman Method survey was mailed to 1,447 AM and 1,443 CDN surgeons. Factors evaluated included preoperative assessment, margin definition, surgical techniques, and re-excision practices. The response rate was 26% and 51% for AM and CDN surgeons, respectively. There was variation in use of preoperative core biopsies. American surgeons required wider margins for invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ, and more often recommend re-excision for invasive cancer with 1 and 2 mm margins (p < 0.05). There was also variability in surgical techniques used for intraoperative margin assessment. Wide variation in BCS practice was observed, with some of this variability related to surgeon country.
尽管保乳手术(BCS)很常见,但该手术的几个方面仍存在争议。我们进行了一项横断面调查,以比较加拿大(CDN)和美国(AM)普通外科医生报告的保乳手术实践模式,以便更好地了解早期乳腺癌手术治疗中的跨境差异。一份经过修改的迪尔曼方法调查问卷被邮寄给1447名美国外科医生和1443名加拿大外科医生。评估的因素包括术前评估、切缘定义、手术技术和再次切除实践。美国和加拿大外科医生的回复率分别为26%和51%。术前粗针活检的使用存在差异。美国外科医生对浸润性癌和导管原位癌要求更宽的切缘,并且更常建议对切缘为1毫米和2毫米的浸润性癌进行再次切除(p<0.05)。术中切缘评估所使用的手术技术也存在差异。观察到保乳手术实践存在很大差异,其中一些差异与外科医生所在国家有关。