Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;3(10):1352-1357. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0774.
IMPORTANCE: Surgery after initial lumpectomy to obtain more widely clear margins is common and may lead to mastectomy. OBJECTIVE: To describe surgeons' approach to surgical margins for invasive breast cancer, and changes in postlumpectomy surgery rates, and final surgical treatment following a 2014 consensus statement endorsing a margin of "no ink on tumor." DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a population-based cohort survey study of 7303 eligible women ages 20 to 79 years with stage I and II breast cancer diagnosed in 2013 to 2015 and identified from the Georgia and Los Angeles County, California, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. A total of 5080 (70%) returned a survey. Those with bilateral disease, missing stage or treatment data, and with ductal carcinoma in situ were excluded, leaving 3729 patients in the analytic sample; 98% of these identified their attending surgeon. Between April 2015 and May 2016, 488 surgeons were surveyed regarding lumpectomy margins; 342 (70%) responded completely. Pathology reports of all patients having a second surgery and a 30% sample of those with 1 surgery were reviewed. Time trends were analyzed with multinomial regression models. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rates of final surgical procedure (lumpectomy, unilateral mastectomy, bilateral mastectomy) and rates of additional surgery after initial lumpectomy over time, and surgeon attitudes toward an adequate lumpectomy margin. RESULTS: The 67% rate of initial lumpectomy in the 3729 patient analytic sample was unchanged during the study. The rate of final lumpectomy increased by 13% from 2013 to 2015, accompanied by a decrease in unilateral and bilateral mastectomy (P = .002). Surgery after initial lumpectomy declined by 16% (P < .001). Pathology review documented no significant association between date of treatment and positive margins. Of 342 responding surgeons, 69% endorsed a margin of no ink on tumor to avoid reexcision in estrogen receptor-positive progesterone receptor-positive cancer and 63% for estrogen receptor-negative progesterone- receptor-negative cancer. Surgeons treating more than 50 breast cancers annually were significantly more likely to report this margin as adequate (85%; n = 105) compared with those treating 20 cases or fewer (55%; n = 131) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Additional surgery after initial lumpectomy decreased markedly from 2013 to 2015 concomitant with dissemination of clinical guidelines endorsing a minimal negative margin. These findings suggest that surgeon-led initiatives to address potential overtreatment can reduce the burden of surgical management in patients with cancer.
重要性:初始乳房肿瘤切除术(lumpectomy)后进行手术以获得更广泛的切缘是常见的,并且可能导致乳房切除术。 目的:描述外科医生对浸润性乳腺癌手术切缘的处理方法,以及在 2014 年支持“无肿瘤墨渍”的切缘共识声明后,保乳术后手术率和最终手术治疗的变化。 设计、地点和参与者:这是一项基于人群的队列调查研究,纳入了 2013 年至 2015 年期间在佐治亚州和加利福尼亚州洛杉矶县监测、流行病学和最终结果登记处确诊的 7303 名年龄在 20 岁至 79 岁之间的 I 期和 II 期乳腺癌患者。共有 5080 名(70%)患者返回了调查问卷。排除双侧疾病、缺少分期或治疗数据以及导管原位癌的患者后,在分析样本中纳入了 3729 例患者;其中 98%的患者识别了他们的主治医生。在 2015 年 4 月至 2016 年 5 月期间,对 488 名外科医生进行了保乳术切缘调查;342 名(70%)医生完整地回复了调查。对所有接受第二次手术的患者的病理报告和 1 次手术患者的 30%样本进行了审查。采用多变量回归模型分析时间趋势。 主要结果和措施:最终手术程序(保乳术、单侧乳房切除术、双侧乳房切除术)的发生率以及初始保乳术后额外手术的发生率随时间的变化,以及外科医生对充分保乳术切缘的态度。 结果:在 3729 名患者的分析样本中,初始保乳术的比例为 67%,在研究期间保持不变。2013 年至 2015 年,保乳术的最终比例增加了 13%,同时单侧和双侧乳房切除术的比例下降(P=0.002)。初始保乳术后的手术量减少了 16%(P<0.001)。病理检查结果显示,治疗时间与阳性切缘之间没有显著关联。在 342 名回复的外科医生中,69%的人支持在雌激素受体阳性孕激素受体阳性癌症中切除无肿瘤墨渍以避免再次切除,63%的人支持在雌激素受体阴性孕激素受体阴性癌症中切除无肿瘤墨渍(P<0.001)。每年治疗超过 50 例乳腺癌的外科医生报告该切缘足够的可能性明显高于每年治疗 20 例或更少乳腺癌的外科医生(85%;n=105)比(55%;n=131)(P<0.001)。 结论和相关性:从 2013 年到 2015 年,初始保乳术后的额外手术明显减少,同时传播了支持最小负切缘的临床指南。这些发现表明,外科医生主导的解决潜在过度治疗的举措可以减少癌症患者的手术管理负担。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009-10-22
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018-2-21
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-5-21
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025-5
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023-11
N Engl J Med. 2015-8-6
JAMA Surg. 2015-1