Suppr超能文献

医疗设备创新的障碍。

Barriers to medical device innovation.

作者信息

Bergsland Jacob, Elle Ole Jakob, Fosse Erik

机构信息

The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Jun 13;7:205-9. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S43369. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has defined a medical device as a health care product that does not achieve it's purpose by chemical action or by being metabolized. This means that a vast number of products are considered medical devices. Such devices play an essential role in the practice of medicine. The FDA classifies medical devices in three classes, depending on the risk of the device. Since Class I and II devices have relatively simple requirements for getting to the market, this review will focus on "implantable devices", which, in general, belong to Class III. The European Union and Canada use a slightly different classification system. While early generations of medical devices were introduced without much testing, either technical or clinical, the process of introducing a Class III medical device from concept to clinical practice has become strongly regulated and requires extensive technological and clinical testing. The modern era of implantable medical devices may be considered to have started in the 1920s with development of artificial hips. The implantable pacemaker was another milestone and pacemakers and cardioverters/defibrillators have since saved millions of lives and created commercial giants in the medical device industry. This review will include some examples of cardiovascular devices. Similar considerations apply to the total implantable device market, although clinical and technological applications obviously vary considerably.

摘要

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)将医疗器械定义为一种并非通过化学作用或新陈代谢来实现其用途的医疗保健产品。这意味着大量产品都被视为医疗器械。此类器械在医疗实践中发挥着至关重要的作用。FDA根据器械的风险将医疗器械分为三类。由于I类和II类器械进入市场的要求相对简单,本综述将聚焦于“可植入器械”,总体而言,可植入器械属于III类。欧盟和加拿大采用的分类系统略有不同。早期的医疗器械在引入时,无论是技术测试还是临床测试都很少,而将III类医疗器械从概念引入临床实践的过程如今已受到严格监管,并且需要进行广泛的技术和临床测试。可植入医疗器械的现代时代或许可以追溯到20世纪20年代人工髋关节的研发。可植入式心脏起搏器是另一个里程碑,自那以后,心脏起搏器以及心脏复律除颤器挽救了数百万人的生命,并造就了医疗器械行业的商业巨头。本综述将列举一些心血管器械的例子。尽管临床和技术应用显然差异很大,但类似的考量也适用于整个可植入器械市场。

相似文献

1
Barriers to medical device innovation.医疗设备创新的障碍。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Jun 13;7:205-9. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S43369. eCollection 2014.
4
Regulatory clearance: How are outcome measurements critical?监管审批:结果测量为何至关重要?
Injury. 2020 May;51 Suppl 2:S67-S70. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.071. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
10
FDA's perspectives on cardiovascular devices.FDA 对心血管器械的看法。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2009 Jun;2(2):143-6. doi: 10.1007/s12265-009-9096-7. Epub 2009 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

7
The complex landscape of TMS devices: A brief overview.经颅磁刺激仪设备的复杂格局:简要概述。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0292733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292733. eCollection 2023.
10
Wireless monitoring devices in hospitalized children: a scoping review.住院儿童的无线监测设备:范围综述。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 May;182(5):1991-2003. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04881-w. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

3
A new model for graduate education and innovation in medical technology.医学技术研究生教育与创新的新模式。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Sep;41(9):1822-33. doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0869-4. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验