Suppr超能文献

欧盟医疗器械法规的变化:对研究、创新和临床实践的影响。

Changing Device Regulations in the European Union: Impact on Research, Innovation and Clinical Practice.

作者信息

Vasiljeva Ksenija, van Duren Bernard H, Pandit Hemant

机构信息

Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), Chapel Allerton Hospital, University of Leeds, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2020 Feb 6;54(2):123-129. doi: 10.1007/s43465-019-00013-5. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Up until 2017, medical devices were placed on the European Union's (EU) single market in accordance with either Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC for general medical devices or Medical Device Directive 90/385/EEC for active implantable devices. However, some devices that complied with these directives still failed catastrophically. In the orthopaedic device field, these failures were most pronounced in metal-on-metal hip devices causing severe patient morbidity with increased need for revision surgery which had unpredictable outcomes. Subsequently, the newly introduced Medical Device Regulations 2017/745 are aimed at addressing patient safety based on previous experience and thorough device assessment prior to and post-release on the EU single market; to accommodate for this they are substantially different (and more stringent). This poses a greater challenge for manufacturers and regulatory bodies in terms of time and resources.

METHODS

A review of the EU directives and published literature was undertaken. This review provides the rationale behind this change and its potential impact on research, industry, and clinical practice.

DISCUSSION

The change in legal requirements for the medical devices to be put on the EU single market ultimately leads to increased patient safety, which is supported by clinical professionals. The new requirements for data transparency, post-market surveillance, and implant information availability increase the chance of catastrophic failure prevention. However, the exact method of implementation remains uncertain, and some essential rules on the data requirements for compliance have not yet been published by the EU. These limitations may limit the availability of products on the market including withdrawal of existing devices and a decrease in new medical device innovation. It is speculated that lack of new technologies within the medical device area can dramatically affect patient safety itself by not allowing potentially safer materials and methods on the EU single market, as the focus for the manufacturer becomes existing devices.

摘要

背景

直到2017年,医疗设备依据《欧盟通用医疗设备指令93/42/EEC》或《欧盟有源植入式设备指令90/385/EEC》进入欧盟单一市场。然而,一些符合这些指令的设备仍遭遇了灾难性故障。在骨科设备领域,此类故障在金属对金属髋关节设备中最为显著,导致患者出现严重病症,翻修手术需求增加,且手术结果不可预测。随后,新出台的《2017/745号医疗器械法规》旨在基于以往经验以及在欧盟单一市场投放前和投放后的全面设备评估来解决患者安全问题;为此,这些法规有很大不同(且更为严格)。这在时间和资源方面给制造商和监管机构带来了更大挑战。

方法

对欧盟指令和已发表文献进行了综述。该综述阐述了这一变化背后的基本原理及其对研究、行业和临床实践的潜在影响。

讨论

欧盟单一市场上医疗设备法律要求的变化最终提高了患者安全性,这得到了临床专业人员的支持。对数据透明度、上市后监测和植入物信息可用性的新要求增加了预防灾难性故障的可能性。然而,具体的实施方法仍不确定,欧盟尚未公布一些关于合规数据要求的基本规则。这些限制可能会限制市场上产品的供应,包括现有设备的撤市以及新医疗器械创新的减少。据推测,医疗器械领域缺乏新技术可能会极大地影响患者安全本身,因为这使得潜在更安全的材料和方法无法进入欧盟单一市场,因为制造商的重点变成了现有设备。

相似文献

1
Changing Device Regulations in the European Union: Impact on Research, Innovation and Clinical Practice.
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Feb 6;54(2):123-129. doi: 10.1007/s43465-019-00013-5. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Regulatory clearance: How are outcome measurements critical?
Injury. 2020 May;51 Suppl 2:S67-S70. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.071. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
5
Medical device legislation for custom-made devices after the UK has left the EU: answers to a further ten important questions.
Br Dent J. 2023 Aug;235(3):205-210. doi: 10.1038/s41415-023-6104-2. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
7
Medical device legislation for custom-made devices after the UK has left the EU: answers to ten important questions.
Br Dent J. 2021 Oct;231(8):513-521. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3530-x. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
8
Legal and Normative Requirements Related to Medical Devices for Individual Supply in Clinical Practice.
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2021 Oct 31;23(5):381-387. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.4360.
10
Early experience of the European Medical Devices Vigilance System.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 1997 Dec;20(4):203-6.

引用本文的文献

3
Acetabular Revision with McMinn Cup: Development and Application of a Patient-Specific Targeting Device.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Sep 18;10(9):1095. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10091095.
4
The Challenges for Manufacturers of the Increased Clinical Evaluation in the European Medical Device Regulations: A Quantitative Study.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):783-796. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00527-z. Epub 2023 May 17.
6
External validation of the Tyrolean hip arthroplasty registry.
J Exp Orthop. 2022 Aug 30;9(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s40634-022-00526-3.
7
Critical Factors and Economic Methods for Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Medical Device Industry.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Jan 19;15:71-91. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S346928. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
MoM total hip replacements in Europe: a NORE report.
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jun 3;4(6):423-429. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180078. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Mapping existing hip and knee replacement registries in Europe.
Health Policy. 2018 May;122(5):548-557. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
3
Transvaginal mesh failure: lessons for regulation of implantable devices.
BMJ. 2017 Dec 7;359:j5515. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5515.
4
Follow-up of patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements.
BMJ. 2017 Jul 18;358:j3387. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3387.
5
Out of joint: the story of the ASR.
BMJ. 2011 May 13;342:d2905. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2905.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验