Tetzlaff Sasha J, Estrada Alondra, DeGregorio Brett A, Sperry Jinelle H
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, IL 61822, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 11;10(2):275. doi: 10.3390/ani10020275.
Although it is widely accepted that juvenile turtles experience high levels of predation, such events are rarely observed, providing limited evidence regarding predator identities and how juvenile habitat selection and availability of sensory cues to predators affects predation risk. We placed three-dimensional printed models resembling juvenile box turtles ( ) across habitats commonly utilized by the species at three sites within their geographical range and monitored models with motion-triggered cameras. To explore how the presence or absence of visual and olfactory cues affected predator interactions with models, we employed a factorial design where models were either exposed or concealed and either did or did not have juvenile box turtle scent applied on them. Predators interacted with 18% of models during field trials. Nearly all interactions were by mesopredators (57%) and rodents (37%). Mesopredators were more likely to attack models than rodents; most (76%) attacks occurred by raccoons ( ). Interactions by mesopredators were more likely to occur in wetlands than edges, and greater in edges than grasslands. Mesopredators were less likely to interact with models as surrounding vegetation height increased. Rodents were more likely to interact with models that were closer to woody structure and interacted with exposed models more than concealed ones, but model exposure had no effect on interactions by mesopredators. Scent treatment appeared to have no influence on interactions by either predator group. Our results suggest raccoons can pose high predation risk for juvenile turtles (although rodents could also be important predators) and habitat features at multiple spatial scales affect predator-specific predation risk. Factors affecting predation risk for juveniles are important to consider in management actions such as habitat alteration, translocation, or predator control.
尽管人们普遍认为幼年海龟面临着很高的被捕食风险,但此类事件很少被观察到,这使得关于捕食者身份以及幼年海龟的栖息地选择和捕食者的感官线索可用性如何影响捕食风险的证据有限。我们在幼年箱龟地理分布范围内的三个地点,将类似幼年箱龟的三维打印模型放置在该物种常用的栖息地中,并用运动触发相机对模型进行监测。为了探究视觉和嗅觉线索的有无如何影响捕食者与模型的相互作用,我们采用了析因设计,即模型要么暴露在外,要么被隐藏起来,并且要么涂抹了幼年箱龟的气味,要么没有涂抹。在野外试验中,捕食者与18%的模型发生了相互作用。几乎所有的相互作用都是由中型捕食者(57%)和啮齿动物(37%)进行的。中型捕食者比啮齿动物更有可能攻击模型;大多数(76%)攻击是由浣熊进行的。中型捕食者的相互作用在湿地比边缘地带更有可能发生,在边缘地带比草地更频繁。随着周围植被高度的增加,中型捕食者与模型相互作用的可能性降低。啮齿动物更有可能与靠近木质结构的模型相互作用,并且与暴露的模型的相互作用比隐藏的模型更多,但模型暴露对中型捕食者的相互作用没有影响。气味处理似乎对两个捕食者群体的相互作用都没有影响。我们的结果表明,浣熊可能对幼年海龟构成很高的捕食风险(尽管啮齿动物也可能是重要的捕食者),并且多个空间尺度上的栖息地特征会影响特定捕食者的捕食风险。在诸如栖息地改变、转移或捕食者控制等管理行动中,考虑影响幼年海龟捕食风险的因素很重要。