• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻泪管支架用于外路、内镜及经泪小管泪囊鼻腔吻合术时生物膜定植的扫描电子显微镜检查结果与微生物学结果的比较

Comparison of scanning electron microscopy findings regarding biofilm colonization with microbiological results in nasolacrimal stents for external, endoscopic and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy.

作者信息

Balikoglu-Yilmaz Melike, Yilmaz Tolga, Cetinel Sule, Taskin Umit, Banu Esen Ayse, Taskapili Muhittin, Kose Timur

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34200, Turkey.

Department of Histology&Embryology, Marmara University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul 34854, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun 18;7(3):534-40. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.27. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.27
PMID:24967205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4067673/
Abstract

AIM

To compare bacterial biofilm colonization in lacrimal stents following external dacryocystorhinostomy (EX-DCR), endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR), and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy (TC-DCR) with multidiode laser.

METHODS

This prospective study included 30 consecutive patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent EXT-, EN-, or TC-DCR. Thirty removed lacrimal stent fragments and conjunctival samples were cultured. The lacrimal stent biofilms were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

Eleven (36.7%) of the 30 lacrimal stent cultures were positive for aerobic bacteria (most commonly Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). However anaerobic bacteria and fungi were not identified in the lacrimal stent cultures. Twenty-seven (90%) patients had biofilm-positive lacrimal stents. The conjunctival culture positivity after the DCR, biofilm positivity on stents, the grade of biofilm colonization, and the presence of mucus and coccoid and rod-shaped organisms did not significantly differ between any of the groups (P>0.05). However, a significant difference was found when the SEM results were compared to the results of the lacrimal stent and conjunctival cultures (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Type of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery did not affect the biofilm colonization of the lacrimal stents. SEM also appears to be more precise than microbiological culture for evaluating the presence of biofilms on lacrimal stents.

摘要

目的

比较外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术(EX-DCR)、内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术(EN-DCR)和经泪小管泪囊鼻腔吻合术(TC-DCR)联合多二极管激光治疗后泪道支架上细菌生物膜的定植情况。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了30例连续接受EXT-、EN-或TC-DCR治疗的鼻泪管阻塞患者。对30个取出的泪道支架碎片和结膜样本进行培养。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查泪道支架生物膜。

结果

30个泪道支架培养物中有11个(36.7%)需氧菌培养呈阳性(最常见的是表皮葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌)。然而,在泪道支架培养物中未发现厌氧菌和真菌。27例(90%)患者的泪道支架生物膜呈阳性。泪囊鼻腔吻合术后结膜培养阳性率、支架上生物膜阳性率、生物膜定植等级以及黏液、球菌和杆菌状生物体的存在在任何组之间均无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,将SEM结果与泪道支架和结膜培养结果进行比较时发现有显著差异(P<0.001)。

结论

泪囊鼻腔吻合术(DCR)的手术类型不影响泪道支架上生物膜的定植。对于评估泪道支架上生物膜的存在,SEM似乎比微生物培养更精确。

相似文献

1
Comparison of scanning electron microscopy findings regarding biofilm colonization with microbiological results in nasolacrimal stents for external, endoscopic and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy.鼻泪管支架用于外路、内镜及经泪小管泪囊鼻腔吻合术时生物膜定植的扫描电子显微镜检查结果与微生物学结果的比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun 18;7(3):534-40. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.27. eCollection 2014.
2
Bacteriological profile in conjunctival, lacrimal sac, and nasal specimens and conjunctival normalization time following external, endoscopic, and transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy.外路、内镜及经泪小管多二极管激光泪囊鼻腔造孔术后结膜、泪囊和鼻腔标本的细菌学特征及结膜恢复正常时间
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016 May-Jun;79(3):163-70. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20160049.
3
Biofilm Quantification on Nasolacrimal Silastic Stents After Dacryocystorhinostomy.泪囊鼻腔吻合术后鼻泪管硅胶支架上生物膜的定量分析
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Sep-Oct;31(5):396-400. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000361.
4
Management of functional epiphora in patients with an anatomically patent dacryocystorhinostomy.泪囊鼻腔吻合术解剖结构通畅患者功能性溢泪的管理
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;132(9):1127-32. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1093.
5
Comparison of transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.经泪小管二极管激光泪囊鼻腔造口术与外路泪囊鼻腔造口术治疗原发性获得性鼻泪管阻塞患者的比较
Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):275-80. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22236. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
6
Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with ostial stent intubation following nasolacrimal duct stent incarceration.鼻泪管支架嵌顿后经鼻内镜鼻内泪囊鼻腔造口术并置入开口支架
Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(12):1185-94. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2014.987873. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
7
Surgical success rate comparison in functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction: simple lacrimal stent versus endoscopic versus external dacryocystorhinostomy.功能性鼻泪管阻塞的手术成功率比较:单纯泪道支架置入术与内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术与外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Feb;270(2):535-40. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2014-7. Epub 2012 May 8.
8
Mechanical transnasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy versus transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy: long-term results of a prospective study.经鼻内镜下机械泪囊鼻腔吻合术与经鼻内窥镜多二极管激光泪囊鼻腔吻合术:前瞻性研究的长期结果。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Mar;36(2):349-356. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-03038-7. Epub 2020 May 20.
9
Prospective comparison of 3 dacryocystorhinostomy surgeries: external versus endoscopic versus transcanalicular multidiode laser.3种泪囊鼻腔造口术的前瞻性比较:外路法与内镜法与经泪小管多二极管激光法
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;31(1):13-8. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000159.
10
Long-term outcomes after transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy.经鼻内窥镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术治疗慢性泪囊炎的临床疗效分析
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012 Aug;32(4):258-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Bacterial Biofilm Formation in Nasolacrimal Silicone Tubes Post-dacryocystorhinostomy.泪囊鼻腔吻合术后鼻泪管硅胶管内细菌生物膜形成的特征
Cureus. 2024 Mar 13;16(3):e56112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56112. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Scanning electron microscopic features of lacrimal drainage silastic stents: Comparison of various Crawford and large-diameter stents.泪道引流硅橡胶支架的扫描电子显微镜特征:各种 Crawford 支架和大直径支架的比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0295285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295285. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparative outcomes of the pathogen in cultured Jones tubes used in lacrimal bypass surgery according to follow up periods.根据随访期,泪道旁路手术中使用的培养琼斯管内病原体的比较结果。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct 18;16(10):1623-1629. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.10.10. eCollection 2023.
4
Species-specific characteristics of the biofilm generated in silicone tube: an in vitro study.硅胶管中生物膜形成的种属特异性特征:一项体外研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0750-1.
5
Yeast Surface Display of Escherichia coli Enterotoxin and Its Effects of Intestinal Microflora and Mucosal Immunity.大肠杆菌肠毒素的酵母表面展示及其对肠道微生物群和黏膜免疫的影响
Curr Microbiol. 2017 Jul;74(7):854-862. doi: 10.1007/s00284-017-1259-1. Epub 2017 May 2.
6
Conjunctival bacterial flora in fellow eyes of patients with unilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction and its changes after successful dacryocystorhinostomy surgery.单侧鼻泪管阻塞患者健侧眼结膜细菌菌群及其泪囊鼻腔吻合术成功后的变化
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 3;29(1):59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2016.11.001. eCollection 2017 Mar.
7
Biofilms in infections of the eye.眼部感染中的生物膜。
Pathogens. 2015 Mar 23;4(1):111-36. doi: 10.3390/pathogens4010111.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of lactoferricin B against keratitis-associated fungal biofilms.乳铁蛋白 B 对真菌性角膜炎生物膜的作用。
J Infect Chemother. 2012 Oct;18(5):698-703. doi: 10.1007/s10156-012-0398-3. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
2
Infectious endophthalmitis in adult eyes receiving Boston type I keratoprosthesis.成人 Boston Ⅰ型角膜移植术后眼感染性眼内炎。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):674-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.009. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
3
Clinical significance of microbial growth on the surfaces of silicone tubes removed from dacryocystorhinostomy patients.从泪囊鼻腔吻合术患者移除的硅胶管表面微生物生长的临床意义。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;153(1):189-90; author reply 190-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.007.
4
Clinical significance of microbial growth on the surfaces of silicone tubes removed from dacryocystorhinostomy patients.经鼻内窥镜鼻腔泪囊吻合术后取出的硅胶管表面微生物生长的临床意义。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;153(2):253-257.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.030. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
5
Recurrent enterococcal endophthalmitis seeded by an intraocular lens biofilm.由眼内晶状体生物膜引发的复发性肠球菌性眼内炎。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1355-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.014.
6
Biofilm colonisation in nasolacrimal stents.
B-ENT. 2011;7(1):7-10.
7
Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.经鼻泪囊鼻腔造口术与外路泪囊鼻腔造口术治疗鼻泪管阻塞的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19(1):CD007097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007097.pub2.
8
Methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus species among health care and nonhealth care workers undergoing cataract surgery.接受白内障手术的医护人员和非医护人员中葡萄球菌的耐甲氧西林情况。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec 10;4:1505-14. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S14333.
9
A three-phase in-vitro system for studying Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion and biofilm formation upon hydrogel contact lenses.用于研究绿脓假单胞菌在水凝胶隐形眼镜上黏附和生物膜形成的三相体外系统。
BMC Microbiol. 2010 Nov 9;10:282. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-282.
10
AzaSite® inhibits Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus biofilm formation in vitro.AzaSite® 可抑制金黄色葡萄球菌和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌体外生物膜的形成。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Dec;26(6):557-62. doi: 10.1089/jop.2010.0097. Epub 2010 Oct 28.