Bellar David, Moody Kaitlyn M, Richard Nicholas S, Judge Lawrence W
School of Kinesiology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, 225 Cajundome Blvd, Lafayette, LA 70506, USA.
School of Physical Education, Sport & Exercise Science, Ball State University, 2000 W. University Ave, Muncie, IN 47306, USA.
ISRN Nutr. 2014 Jan 16;2014:149549. doi: 10.1155/2014/149549. eCollection 2014.
The present investigation evaluated the efficacy of a botanical supplement that delivered a concentrated dose of Echinacea purpurea (8 grams day(-1)). The participants were 13 apparently healthy, recreationally active college students (VO2 max: 51 mL O2/kg∗min). The participants were provided with a 30-day supplementation regime. Data regarding maximum aerobic capacity was collected through pre- and posttesting surrounding the 30-day supplementation regime. The participants were instructed to maintain normal levels of physical activity and exercise during the experimental period. The levels of physical activity and exercise were monitored via the Leisure and Physical Activity Survey. The participants did not report any significant increases in aerobic physical activity or exercise during the supplementation period. Paired samples t-test analysis did not reveal a significant difference in maximum aerobic capacity, t(12) = 0.67, P = .516. Presupplementation maximum aerobic capacity (M = 51.0, SD = 6.8) was similar to postsupplementation values (M = 51.8, SD = 6.5). This study suggests that botanical supplements containing a concentrated dose of Echinacea purpurea is not an effective intervention to increase aerobic capacity of recreationally active individuals.
本研究评估了一种提供高剂量紫锥菊(8克/天)的植物性补充剂的功效。参与者为13名看似健康、有休闲运动习惯的大学生(最大摄氧量:51毫升氧气/千克·分钟)。为参与者提供了一个为期30天的补充方案。通过在30天补充方案前后进行测试,收集有关最大有氧能力的数据。在实验期间,指导参与者保持正常的身体活动和锻炼水平。通过休闲与体育活动调查监测身体活动和锻炼水平。在补充期间,参与者未报告有氧身体活动或锻炼有任何显著增加。配对样本t检验分析未显示最大有氧能力有显著差异,t(12) = 0.67,P = 0.516。补充前的最大有氧能力(M = 51.0,标准差 = 6.8)与补充后的数值(M = 51.8,标准差 = 6.5)相似。这项研究表明,含有高剂量紫锥菊的植物性补充剂不是提高有休闲运动习惯个体有氧能力的有效干预措施。