Cope Anwen, Francis Nick, Wood Fiona, Mann Mala K, Chestnutt Ivor G
Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, PCPH, 3rd Floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK, CF14 4YS.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 26(6):CD010136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010136.pub2.
Dental pain can have a considerable detrimental effect on an individual's quality of life. Symptomatic apical periodontitis and acute apical abscess are common causes of dental pain and arise from an inflamed or necrotic dental pulp, or infection of the pulpless root canal system. Clinical guidelines recommend that the first-line treatment for teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis or an acute apical abscess should be removal of the source of inflammation or infection by local, operative measures, and that systemic antibiotics are currently only recommended for situations where there is evidence of spreading infection (cellulitis, lymph node involvement, diffuse swelling) or systemic involvement (fever, malaise). Despite this, there is evidence that dentists continue to prescribe antibiotics for these conditions. There is concern that this could contribute to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacterial colonies both within the individual and within the community as a whole.
To evaluate the effects of systemic antibiotics provided with or without surgical intervention (such as extraction, incision and drainage of a swelling or endodontic treatment), with or without analgesics, for symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess in adults.
We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 1 October 2013); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 9); MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 1 October 2013); EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 1 October 2013) and CINAHL via EBSCO (1980 to 1 October 2013). We searched the World Health Organization (WHO) International Trials Registry Platform and the US National Institutes of Health Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov) on 1 October 2013 to identify ongoing trials. We searched for grey literature using OpenGrey (to 1 October 2013) and ZETOC Conference Proceedings (1993 to 1 October 2013). We placed no restrictions on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases.
Randomised controlled trials of systemic antibiotics in adults with a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess, with or without surgical intervention (considered in this situation to be extraction, incision and drainage or endodontic treatment) and with or without analgesics.
Two review authors screened the results of the searches against inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias independently and in duplicate. We calculated mean differences (MD) (standardised mean difference (SMD) when different scales were reported) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous data and, where results were meta-analysed, we used a fixed-effect model as there were fewer than four studies. We contacted study authors to obtain missing information.
We included two trials in this review, with 62 participants included in the analyses. Both trials were conducted in university dental schools in the USA and compared the effects of oral penicillin V potassium (penicillin VK) versus a matched placebo given in conjunction with a surgical intervention (total or partial pulpectomy) and analgesics to adults with acute apical abscess or symptomatic necrotic tooth (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement (fever, malaise)). We assessed one study as having a high risk of bias and the other study as having unclear risk of bias.The primary outcome variables presented were participant-reported pain and swelling (one trial also reported participant-reported percussion pain). One study reported the type and number of analgesics taken by participants. One study recorded the incidence of postoperative endodontic flare-ups (people who returned with symptoms that necessitated further treatment). Adverse effects as reported in one study were diarrhoea (one participant, placebo group) and fatigue and reduced energy postoperatively (one participant, antibiotic group). No studies reporting quality of life measurements were suitable for inclusion. Objective 1: systemic antibiotics versus placebo with surgical intervention and analgesics for symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess. Two studies provided data for the comparison between systemic antibiotics (penicillin VK) and a matched placebo for adults with acute apical abscess or a symptomatic necrotic tooth. Participants in one study all underwent a total pulpectomy of the affected tooth while participants in the other study had their tooth treated by either partial or total pulpectomy. Participants in both trials received oral analgesics. There were no statistically significant differences in participant-reported measures of pain or swelling at any of the time points assessed within the review. The MD for pain (short ordinal numerical scale 0 to 3) was -0.03 (95% CI -0.53 to 0.47) at 24 hours; 0.32 (95% CI -0.22 to 0.86) at 48 hours and 0.08 (95% CI -0.38 to 0.54) at 72 hours. The SMD for swelling was 0.27 (95% CI -0.23 to 0.78) at 24 hours; 0.04 (95% CI -0.47 to 0.55) at 48 hours and 0.02 (95% CI -0.49 to 0.52) at 72 hours. The body of evidence was assessed as at very low quality. Objective 2: systemic antibiotics without surgical intervention for adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess. We found no studies that compared the effects of systemic antibiotics with a matched placebo delivered without a surgical intervention for symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess in adults.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is very low quality evidence that is insufficient to determine the effects of systemic antibiotics on adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess.
牙痛会对个人生活质量产生相当大的不利影响。症状性根尖周炎和急性根尖脓肿是牙痛的常见原因,源于牙髓发炎或坏死,或无牙髓根管系统感染。临床指南建议,对于有症状性根尖周炎或急性根尖脓肿的牙齿,一线治疗应通过局部手术措施去除炎症或感染源,目前仅在有感染扩散(蜂窝织炎、淋巴结受累、弥漫性肿胀)或全身受累(发热、不适)证据的情况下推荐使用全身性抗生素。尽管如此,有证据表明牙医仍在继续为这些病症开抗生素。人们担心这可能会导致个体内部和整个社区内产生对抗生素耐药的细菌菌落。
评估全身性抗生素在有或无手术干预(如拔牙、肿胀切开引流或牙髓治疗)、有或无镇痛药的情况下,对成人症状性根尖周炎或急性根尖脓肿的影响。
我们检索了以下电子数据库:Cochrane口腔健康组试验注册库(截至2013年10月1日);Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2013年第9期);通过OVID检索的MEDLINE(1946年至2013年10月1日);通过OVID检索的EMBASE(1980年至2013年10月1日)以及通过EBSCO检索的CINAHL(1980年至2013年10月1日)。我们于2013年10月1日检索了世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台和美国国立卫生研究院临床试验注册库(ClinicalTrials.gov)以识别正在进行的试验。我们使用OpenGrey(截至2013年10月1日)和ZETOC会议论文集(1993年至2013年10月1日)检索灰色文献。在检索电子数据库时,我们对语言或出版日期未加限制。
对临床诊断为症状性根尖周炎或急性根尖脓肿的成人使用全身性抗生素的随机对照试验,有或无手术干预(在这种情况下视为拔牙、切开引流或牙髓治疗),有或无镇痛药。
两位综述作者根据纳入标准筛选检索结果,独立且重复地提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们计算了连续数据的平均差(MD)(当报告不同量表时为标准化平均差(SMD))和95%置信区间(CI),并且在对结果进行荟萃分析时,由于研究少于四项,我们使用了固定效应模型。我们联系研究作者以获取缺失信息。
本综述纳入了两项试验,分析中纳入了62名参与者。两项试验均在美国的大学牙科学院进行,比较了口服青霉素V钾(青霉素VK)与匹配安慰剂联合手术干预(全部或部分牙髓摘除术)和镇痛药对患有急性根尖脓肿或症状性坏死牙(无感染扩散或全身受累(发热、不适)迹象)的成人的影响。我们将一项研究评估为具有高偏倚风险,另一项研究的偏倚风险不明确。呈现的主要结局变量为参与者报告的疼痛和肿胀(一项试验还报告了参与者报告的叩痛)。一项研究报告了参与者服用的镇痛药类型和数量。一项研究记录了术后牙髓急性发作的发生率(因症状复发需要进一步治疗的人)。一项研究报告的不良反应为腹泻(一名参与者,安慰剂组)以及术后疲劳和精力下降(一名参与者,抗生素组)。没有报告生活质量测量值的研究适合纳入。目标1:全身性抗生素与安慰剂联合手术干预和镇痛药治疗症状性根尖周炎或急性根尖脓肿。两项研究提供了全身性抗生素(青霉素VK)与匹配安慰剂对患有急性根尖脓肿或症状性坏死牙的成人进行比较的数据。一项研究中的参与者均接受了患牙的全部牙髓摘除术,而另一项研究中的参与者的牙齿接受了部分或全部牙髓摘除术。两项试验中的参与者均接受了口服镇痛药。在本综述评估的任何时间点,参与者报告的疼痛或肿胀测量值均无统计学显著差异。24小时时疼痛的MD(短序数量表0至3)为 -0.03(95%CI -0.53至0.47);48小时时为0.32(95%CI -0.22至0.86),72小时时为0.08(95%CI -0.38至0.54)。肿胀的SMD在24小时时为0.27(95%CI -0.23至0.78);48小时时为0.04(95%CI -0.47至0.55),72小时时为0.02(95%CI -0.49至0.52)。证据质量被评估为极低。目标2:无手术干预的全身性抗生素治疗有症状性根尖周炎或急性根尖脓肿的成人。我们未发现有研究比较全身性抗生素与匹配安慰剂在无手术干预情况下对成人症状性根尖周炎或急性根尖脓肿的影响。
证据质量极低,不足以确定全身性抗生素对患有症状性根尖周炎或急性根尖脓肿的成人的影响。