Suppr超能文献

[动脉结扎术治疗复发性鼻出血:是与时俱进还是过时之举?]

[Treatment of recurrent epistaxis by artery ligation: up to date or old fashioned?].

作者信息

Weller P, Christov F, Bergmann C, Lang S, Lehnerdt G

机构信息

Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen.

出版信息

Laryngorhinootologie. 2014 Oct;93(10):665-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1375661. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Treatment of Recurrent Epistaxis by Artery Ligation: Up to Date or Old Fashioned?

BACKGROUND

Despite the ongoing development in the field of endoscopic treatment techniques, recurrent epistaxis remains a challenge for otolaryngologists. The aim of the present study was to compare our own results of various interventions for the treatment of recurrent epistaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2007 to 2013 we performed surgical treatment of recurrent epistaxis under general anaesthesia in 148 cases. While the majority of causes were idiopathic (n=98), epistaxis also occurred postoperatively (n=30), post-traumatically (n=7) or as a result of M. Osler (n=12). In 141/148 cases the treatment was performed by mono- or bipolar coagulation in the area of the bleeding source - this required an ethmoidectomy in 17 cases. In 19 cases the intervention was combined with a septoplasty. In 4 patients with recurrent bleeding of unknown origin, where electrocoagulation under general anaesthesia failed, we performed a clipping of the ethmoid- and/or the maxillary arteries in the pterygopalatine fossa. Following this intervention no further bleeding episodes occured. In further 3 patients, neuroradiological embolization was successfully performed.

CONCLUSION

If conservative measures fail in the treatment of epistaxis, surgical treatment by electrocoagulation of the bleeding site under general anaesthesia is an effective intervention in 95% of cases. However for the remaining 5% where these measures have been proven to be ineffective, clipping of the ipsilateral anterior and posterior ethmoid- and/or the maxillar artery provides a treatment option being equally efficient as neuroradiological interventions.

摘要

未标注

动脉结扎治疗复发性鼻出血:过时还是仍具时效性?

背景

尽管内镜治疗技术领域不断发展,但复发性鼻出血仍是耳鼻喉科医生面临的挑战。本研究的目的是比较我们自己采用各种干预措施治疗复发性鼻出血的结果。

材料与方法

2007年至2013年,我们对148例复发性鼻出血患者进行了全身麻醉下的手术治疗。大多数病因是特发性的(n = 98),鼻出血也发生在术后(n = 30)、创伤后(n = 7)或由奥斯勒病引起(n = 12)。在141/148例病例中,在出血源区域进行了单极或双极电凝治疗——其中17例需要进行筛窦切除术。19例干预措施与鼻中隔成形术相结合。在4例不明原因反复出血且全身麻醉下电凝治疗失败的患者中,我们在翼腭窝对筛骨和/或上颌动脉进行了夹闭。该干预措施后未再发生出血事件。另外3例患者成功进行了神经放射栓塞治疗。

结论

如果保守措施治疗鼻出血失败,全身麻醉下对出血部位进行电凝的手术治疗在95%的病例中是一种有效的干预措施。然而,对于其余已证明这些措施无效的5%的病例,夹闭同侧前后筛骨动脉和/或上颌动脉提供了一种与神经放射干预同样有效的治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验