• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于州的儿童哮喘急诊就诊医疗补助费用。

State-based Medicaid costs for pediatric asthma emergency department visits.

作者信息

Pearson William S, Goates Scott A, Harrykissoon Samantha D, Miller Scott A

机构信息

Office of the Associate Director for Policy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop E-02, Atlanta, GA 30329. E-mail:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jun 26;11:E108. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140139.

DOI:10.5888/pcd11.140139
PMID:24967830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4075488/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of childhood asthma in the United States increased from 8.7% in 2001 to 9.5% in 2011. This increased prevalence adds to the costs incurred by state Medicaid programs. We provide state-based cost estimates of pediatric asthma emergency department (ED) visits and highlight an opportunity for states to reduce these costs through a recently changed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regulation.

METHODS

We used a cross-sectional design across multiple data sets to produce state-based cost estimates for asthma-related ED visits among children younger than 18, where Medicaid/CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program) was the primary payer.

RESULTS

There were approximately 629,000 ED visits for pediatric asthma for Medicaid/CHIP enrollees, which cost $272 million in 2010. The average cost per visit was $433. Costs ranged from $282,000 in Alaska to more than $25 million in California.

CONCLUSIONS

Costs to states for pediatric asthma ED visits vary widely. Effective January 1, 2014, the CMS rule expanded which type of providers can be reimbursed for providing preventive services to Medicaid/CHIP beneficiaries. This rule change, in combination with existing flexibility for states to define practice setting, allows state Medicaid programs to reimburse for asthma interventions that use nontraditional providers (such as community health workers or certified asthma educators) in a nonclinical setting, as long as the service was initially recommended by a physician or other licensed practitioner. The rule change may help states reduce Medicaid costs of asthma treatment and the severity of pediatric asthma.

摘要

引言

美国儿童哮喘的患病率从2001年的8.7%上升至2011年的9.5%。患病率的上升增加了州医疗补助计划的成本。我们提供了基于州的儿童哮喘急诊就诊成本估算,并强调了各州通过医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)最近的一项法规变更来降低这些成本的机会。

方法

我们采用跨多个数据集的横断面设计,以得出18岁以下儿童哮喘相关急诊就诊的基于州的成本估算,其中医疗补助/儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)是主要支付方。

结果

医疗补助/CHIP参保儿童因哮喘急诊就诊约62.9万次,2010年花费2.72亿美元。每次就诊的平均成本为433美元。成本从阿拉斯加的28.2万美元到加利福尼亚的超过2500万美元不等。

结论

各州因儿童哮喘急诊就诊的成本差异很大。自2014年1月1日起,CMS规则扩大了可为向医疗补助/CHIP受益人提供预防服务而获得报销的提供者类型。这一规则变更,结合各州在定义执业环境方面现有的灵活性,允许州医疗补助计划为在非临床环境中使用非传统提供者(如社区卫生工作者或认证哮喘教育者)的哮喘干预措施报销费用,只要该服务最初是由医生或其他持牌从业者推荐的。这一规则变更可能有助于各州降低哮喘治疗方面的医疗补助成本以及儿童哮喘的严重程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b870/4075488/a3242469322c/PCD-11-E108s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b870/4075488/a3242469322c/PCD-11-E108s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b870/4075488/a3242469322c/PCD-11-E108s01.jpg

相似文献

1
State-based Medicaid costs for pediatric asthma emergency department visits.基于州的儿童哮喘急诊就诊医疗补助费用。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jun 26;11:E108. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140139.
2
Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: focus on injury-related emergency department utilization and expenditures.美国儿童和青少年医疗保健年度报告:关注与伤害相关的急诊科就诊情况及支出
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):219-240.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.03.032. Epub 2008 May 27.
3
Association of an Asthma Improvement Collaborative With Health Care Utilization in Medicaid-Insured Pediatric Patients in an Urban Community.城市社区中医疗补助保险的儿科患者哮喘改善协作组织与医疗保健利用的关联
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Nov 1;171(11):1072-1080. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2600.
4
Asthma-related healthcare services utilization by African-Americans enrolled in West Virginia Medicaid.西弗吉尼亚医疗补助计划覆盖的非裔美国人哮喘相关医疗服务的使用情况
Respir Med. 2006 Sep;100(9):1579-87. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
5
Cost and utilization analysis of a pediatric emergency department diversion project.儿科急诊科分流项目的成本与利用情况分析
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):1075-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2093.
6
Return on investment of self-management education and home visits for children with asthma.哮喘儿童自我管理教育和家访的投资回报率
J Asthma. 2021 Mar;58(3):360-369. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1690660. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
7
Medicaid Managed Care and Pediatric Dental Emergency Department Visits.医疗补助管理式医疗和儿科牙科急诊就诊。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241472. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1472.
8
The Impact of Tobacco Smoke Exposure on Childhood Asthma in a Medicaid Managed Care Plan.医疗补助管理式医疗计划中烟草烟雾暴露对儿童哮喘的影响
Chest. 2016 Mar;149(3):721-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-1378. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
9
Anti-inflammatory medication adherence, healthcare utilization and expenditures among Medicaid and children's health insurance program enrollees with asthma.哮喘患儿的 Medicaid 和儿童健康保险计划参保者的抗炎药物治疗依从性、医疗保健利用和支出。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 May;30(5):397-412. doi: 10.2165/11586660-000000000-00000.
10
Impact of Chronic Conditions on Emergency Department Visits of Children Using Medicaid.慢性病对使用医疗补助计划的儿童急诊就诊的影响。
J Pediatr. 2017 Mar;182:267-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.11.054. Epub 2016 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Neighborhood Opportunity as a Factor in Pediatric Asthma Visits to the Emergency Department.探究社区环境因素对儿童哮喘急诊就诊的影响
Public Health Rep. 2025 Aug 31:333549251361324. doi: 10.1177/00333549251361324.
2
Comparing a Guideline-Based Mobile Health Intervention Versus Usual Care for High-Risk Adolescents With Asthma: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.比较基于指南的移动健康干预与哮喘高危青少年常规护理:一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 25;14:e69903. doi: 10.2196/69903.
3
Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of Adapt 2 Asthma (A2A), a culturally relevant coping skills and asthma management intervention for Latinx Families.

本文引用的文献

1
A cost analysis for a community-based case management intervention program for pediatric asthma.一项针对儿童哮喘的社区病例管理干预项目的成本分析。
J Asthma. 2013 Apr;50(3):310-7. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.765447. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
2
Trends in asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality in the United States, 2001-2010.2001 - 2010年美国哮喘患病率、医疗保健利用情况及死亡率的趋势
NCHS Data Brief. 2012 May(94):1-8.
3
Community asthma initiative: evaluation of a quality improvement program for comprehensive asthma care.社区哮喘计划:全面哮喘护理质量改进计划的评估。
一项随机对照试验的研究方案,即适应性哮喘 2 期(A2A),这是一种针对拉丁裔家庭的具有文化相关性的应对技能和哮喘管理干预措施。
Trials. 2024 Oct 22;25(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08531-w.
4
Pollen and viruses contribute to spatio-temporal variation in asthma-related emergency department visits.花粉和病毒导致与哮喘相关的急诊科就诊的时空变化。
Environ Res. 2024 Sep 15;257:119346. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119346. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
5
Differences in Health Care Utilization for Asthma by Children with Medicaid versus Private Insurance.儿童哮喘患者利用医疗补助与私人保险的医疗保健差异。
Popul Health Manag. 2024 Apr;27(2):105-113. doi: 10.1089/pop.2023.0244.
6
Medicaid Coverage of Guidelines-Based Asthma Care Across 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2021-2022.2021-2022 年,50 个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各的医疗补助计划对基于指南的哮喘护理的覆盖情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Sep 7;20:E79. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230022.
7
Ozone and childhood respiratory health: A primer for US pediatric providers and a call for a more protective standard.臭氧与儿童呼吸健康:美国儿科医生的入门指南与更具保护性标准的呼吁
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023 May;58(5):1355-1366. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26368. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
8
Feasibility, Efficacy, and Efficiency of eHealth-Supported Pediatric Asthma Care: Six-Month Quasi-Experimental Single-Arm Pretest-Posttest Study.电子健康支持的儿童哮喘护理的可行性、有效性和效率:为期六个月的准实验单臂前后测研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jul 26;5(7):e24634. doi: 10.2196/24634.
9
Nebulized albuterol delivery is associated with decreased skeletal muscle strength in comparison with metered-dose inhaler delivery among children with acute asthma exacerbations.在急性哮喘加重期的儿童中,与使用定量吸入器给药相比,雾化吸入沙丁胺醇与骨骼肌力量下降有关。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Apr 8;2(2):e12422. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12422. eCollection 2021 Apr.
10
A Cloud-connected NO and Ozone Sensor System for Personalized Pediatric Asthma Research and Management.一种用于个性化儿科哮喘研究与管理的云连接式一氧化氮和臭氧传感器系统。
IEEE Sens J. 2020 Dec 15;20(24):15143-15153. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2020.3009911. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):465-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3472. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
4
Economic value of home-based, multi-trigger, multicomponent interventions with an environmental focus for reducing asthma morbidity a community guide systematic review.以家庭为基础、多触发因素、多成分干预措施的经济价值,以环境为重点,减少哮喘发病率:社区指南系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2 Suppl 1):S33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.011.
5
Vital signs: asthma prevalence, disease characteristics, and self-management education: United States, 2001--2009.生命体征:哮喘流行率、疾病特征和自我管理教育:美国,2001-2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 May 6;60(17):547-52.
6
Family and home asthma services across the Controlling Asthma in American Cities Project.美国家庭哮喘控制项目中的家庭和家庭哮喘服务。
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):100-12. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9472-2.
7
Costs of asthma in the United States: 2002-2007.美国哮喘的成本:2002-2007 年。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.020.
8
Characteristics of successful asthma programs.成功的哮喘防治项目的特点。
Public Health Rep. 2009 Nov-Dec;124(6):797-805. doi: 10.1177/003335490912400606.
9
Comparing asthma care for Medicaid and non-Medicaid children in a health maintenance organization.在一家健康维护组织中比较医疗补助计划参保儿童和非医疗补助计划参保儿童的哮喘护理情况。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jun;154(6):563-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.6.563.