• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗服务提供者的讨论及具体建议对美国成年人结直肠癌筛查接受率的影响。

Influence of provider discussion and specific recommendation on colorectal cancer screening uptake among U.S. adults.

作者信息

Laiyemo Adeyinka O, Adebogun Akeem O, Doubeni Chyke A, Ricks-Santi Luisel, McDonald-Pinkett Shelly, Young Patrick E, Cash Brooks D, Klabunde Carrie N

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA; Biometry Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Department of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2014 Oct;67:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.022. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.022
PMID:24967957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4167462/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

It is unclear if provider recommendations regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modalities affect patient compliance. We evaluated provider-patient communications about CRC screening with and without a specific screening modality recommendation on patient compliance with screening guidelines.

METHODS

We used the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) and identified 4283 respondents who were at least 50 years of age and answered questions about their communication with their care providers and CRC screening uptake. We defined being compliant with CRC screening as the use of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) within 1 year, sigmoidoscopy within 5 years, or colonoscopy within 10 years. We used survey weights in all analyses.

RESULTS

CRC screening discussions occurred with 3320 (76.2%) respondents. Approximately 95% of these discussions were with physicians. Overall, 2793 (62.6%) respondents were current with CRC screening regardless of the screening modality. Discussion about screening (odds ratio (OR)=8.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.20-10.84) and providers making a specific recommendation about screening modality rather than leaving it to the patient to decide (OR=2.04; 95% CI: 1.54-2.68) were associated with patient compliance with CRC screening guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Compliance with CRC screening guidelines is improved when providers discuss options and make specific screening test recommendations.

摘要

目的

医疗服务提供者关于结直肠癌(CRC)筛查方式的建议是否会影响患者的依从性尚不清楚。我们评估了医疗服务提供者与患者之间关于CRC筛查的沟通情况,以及有无特定筛查方式建议对患者遵循筛查指南情况的影响。

方法

我们使用了2007年全国健康信息趋势调查(HINTS),确定了4283名年龄至少为50岁且回答了有关其与医疗服务提供者沟通及CRC筛查接受情况问题的受访者。我们将遵循CRC筛查定义为在1年内使用粪便潜血试验(FOBT)、5年内使用乙状结肠镜检查或10年内使用结肠镜检查。我们在所有分析中都使用了调查权重。

结果

3320名(76.2%)受访者进行了CRC筛查讨论。其中约95%的讨论是与医生进行的。总体而言,2793名(62.6%)受访者目前正在进行CRC筛查,无论筛查方式如何。关于筛查的讨论(优势比(OR)=8.83;95%置信区间(CI):7.20 - 10.84)以及医疗服务提供者就筛查方式提出具体建议而非让患者自行决定(OR = 2.04;95% CI:1.54 - 2.68)与患者遵循CRC筛查指南相关。

结论

当医疗服务提供者讨论筛查选项并提出具体的筛查测试建议时,患者对CRC筛查指南的遵循情况会得到改善。

相似文献

1
Influence of provider discussion and specific recommendation on colorectal cancer screening uptake among U.S. adults.医疗服务提供者的讨论及具体建议对美国成年人结直肠癌筛查接受率的影响。
Prev Med. 2014 Oct;67:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.022. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
2
Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening among Mississippi Adults: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.密西西比州成年人结直肠癌筛查相关因素:行为风险因素监测系统的结果。
South Med J. 2020 Jul;113(7):360-365. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001115.
3
Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use--United States, 2012.生命体征:2012 年美国结直肠癌筛查检测使用情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Nov 8;62(44):881-8.
4
Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States.美国脆弱人群中结直肠癌检测使用的趋势。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Aug;20(8):1611-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
5
The Effectiveness of a Physician-Only and Physician-Patient Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Providers and African American and Latino Patients.仅医生参与及医生-患者共同参与的干预措施对医疗服务提供者与非裔美国人和拉丁裔患者之间结直肠癌筛查讨论的有效性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1780-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3381-8. Epub 2015 May 19.
6
Are physicians' recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline-consistent?医生对结直肠癌筛查指南的推荐意见是否一致?
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Feb;26(2):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1516-5. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
7
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.
8
Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.社区对结直肠癌筛查中粪便检测卡与结肠镜检查的偏好
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Feb;23(2):169-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0480-1. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
9
Physicians' use of nonphysician healthcare providers for colorectal cancer screening.医生在结直肠癌筛查中对非医生医疗服务提供者的使用情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Oct;25(3):179-86. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00203-4.
10
Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic.目标人群对捷克共和国结直肠癌筛查障碍和促进因素的观点。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 7;25(9):1132-1141. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Perspectives on Personalized Risk Communication Using Polygenic Risk Scores to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions.患者对使用多基因风险评分进行个性化风险沟通以指导结直肠癌筛查决策的看法。
AJPM Focus. 2024 Dec 4;4(1):100308. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100308. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Risk perception and surveillance uptake in individuals at increased risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.高危人群对胰腺导管腺癌的风险感知和监测接受情况。
J Med Genet. 2024 Feb 21;61(3):270-275. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109539.
3
The use of individual and multilevel data in the development of a risk prediction model to predict patients' likelihood of completing colorectal cancer screening.在开发风险预测模型以预测患者完成结直肠癌筛查可能性的过程中使用个体和多层次数据。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 11;36:102366. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102366. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
"It's Probably Just Hemorrhoids": A Qualitative Exploration of the Lived Experiences and Perceptions of Long-term Survivors of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.“可能只是痔疮”:对早期结直肠癌长期幸存者的生活经历和认知的定性探索。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Nov 1;32(11):1617-1624. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0443.
5
Changes in uptake of stool-based colorectal cancer screening during the Covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间粪便潜血试验用于结直肠癌筛查的变化
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Oct;34(10):887-895. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01733-8. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
Who, where, when: Colorectal cancer disparities by race and ethnicity, subsite, and stage.谁、何处、何时:按种族和民族、部位和分期划分的结直肠癌差异。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(13):14767-14780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6105. Epub 2023 May 22.
7
Examining colorectal cancer screening uptake and health provider recommendations among underserved middle aged and older African Americans.调查非洲裔美国中老年弱势群体的结直肠癌筛查接受情况及医疗服务提供者的建议。
Health Promot Perspect. 2022 Dec 31;12(4):399-409. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2022.52. eCollection 2022.
8
Receipt of follow-up care plans on colorectal cancer screening among breast, prostate, and lung cancer survivors.结直肠癌筛查中乳腺癌、前列腺癌和肺癌幸存者接受随访护理计划的情况。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Jun;18(3):781-790. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01309-6. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
9
Economic Pressure and Intention to Complete Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Among U.S. Men.经济压力与完成结直肠癌筛查意愿:美国男性的横断面分析。
Am J Mens Health. 2022 Sep-Oct;16(5):15579883221125571. doi: 10.1177/15579883221125571.
10
Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) versus colonoscopy: Does knowing that a positive FIT requires a follow-up colonoscopy affect initial decision making in the US?粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)与结肠镜检查:在美国,知晓FIT结果呈阳性需要后续进行结肠镜检查是否会影响初始决策?
Prev Med Rep. 2022 May 13;27:101825. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101825. eCollection 2022 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.筛查软性乙状结肠镜检查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2345-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114635. Epub 2012 May 21.
2
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies.结直肠癌筛查的依从性:竞争策略的随机临床试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 9;172(7):575-82. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332.
3
Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns.医生的结直肠癌筛查讨论和推荐模式。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Mar;20(3):509-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0749. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
4
Colorectal cancer screening adherence in African-American men and women 50 years of age and older living in Maryland.马里兰州 50 岁及以上非裔美国男性和女性的结直肠癌筛查依从性。
J Community Health. 2011 Aug;36(4):517-24. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9336-4.
5
Is discussion of colorectal cancer screening options associated with heightened patient confusion?讨论结直肠癌筛查方案是否会增加患者的困惑?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Nov;19(11):2821-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0695. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
6
Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.单次乙状结肠镜筛查预防结直肠癌:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2010 May 8;375(9726):1624-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60551-X. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
7
Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007.初级保健医生进行的结直肠癌筛查:2006 - 2007年的建议与实践
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Jul;37(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 May 13.
8
Colorectal cancer screening among underserved minority population: discrepancy between physicians' recommended, scheduled, and completed tests.服务不足的少数族裔人群中的结直肠癌筛查:医生建议、安排和完成的检查之间存在差异。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):240-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
9
Colorectal cancer test use from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.2005年美国国家健康访谈调查中的结直肠癌检测使用情况。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jul;17(7):1623-30. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2838.
10
Influence of patient-provider communication on colorectal cancer screening.医患沟通对结直肠癌筛查的影响。
Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):738-45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178935a.