• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对使用多基因风险评分进行个性化风险沟通以指导结直肠癌筛查决策的看法。

Patient Perspectives on Personalized Risk Communication Using Polygenic Risk Scores to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions.

作者信息

Goldberg Shauna R, Ko Linda K, Hsu Li, Yin Hang, Kooperberg Charles, Peters Ulrike, Burnett-Hartman Andrea N

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora, Colorado.

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

AJPM Focus. 2024 Dec 4;4(1):100308. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100308. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.focus.2024.100308
PMID:39866161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11761838/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is increasingly diagnosed in people aged <50 years. New U.S. guidelines recommend screening initiation at age 45 years. Providing personalized risk for colorectal cancer using polygenic risk scores may be an opportunity to engage this younger population in colorectal cancer screening. There is limited research on patient understanding of polygenic risk scores results and use of polygenic risk scores to inform colorectal cancer screening decisions.

METHODS

From May 2022 to June 2023, 20 Kaiser Permanente Colorado members aged 46-51 years who had been offered colorectal cancer screening but had never completed it signed consent to provide a saliva sample for colorectal cancer polygenic risk score analysis. After receiving personalized polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer, participants completed a semistructured interview regarding the understanding of their polygenic risk scores, perceived colorectal cancer risk, and intention to screen. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti, Version 8.

RESULTS

Of the 19 participants who successfully completed polygenic risk score-related testing and a semistructured interview, 13 were female, 14 never smoked cigarettes, 6 were Hispanic, and 13 were non-Hispanic White. One participant had high risk for colorectal cancer on the basis of polygenic risk score results. Qualitative interviews showed participants' understanding of their results, trust in polygenic risk scores, perception of risk for colorectal cancer, plans to complete colorectal cancer screening, intent to share polygenic risk scores with healthcare providers, and concerns about genetic results impacting health care.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative analyses suggest that participants were interested in and understood their polygenic risk score results. Further study is needed to develop guidelines, effective calls to action, provider engagement, and health education materials on use of polygenic risk scores for health decision making.

摘要

引言

越来越多年龄小于50岁的人被诊断出患有结直肠癌。美国新指南建议从45岁开始进行筛查。使用多基因风险评分提供个性化的结直肠癌风险,可能是促使这一年轻人群参与结直肠癌筛查的一个契机。关于患者对多基因风险评分结果的理解以及使用多基因风险评分来指导结直肠癌筛查决策的研究有限。

方法

2022年5月至2023年6月,20名年龄在46 - 51岁之间、曾被提供结直肠癌筛查但从未完成的凯撒永久医疗科罗拉多会员签署同意书,提供唾液样本用于结直肠癌多基因风险评分分析。在收到个性化的结直肠癌多基因风险评分后,参与者完成了一次半结构化访谈,内容涉及对其多基因风险评分的理解、感知的结直肠癌风险以及筛查意愿。使用Atlas.ti 8版本进行主题分析。

结果

在成功完成多基因风险评分相关检测和半结构化访谈的19名参与者中,13名是女性,14名从不吸烟,6名是西班牙裔,13名是非西班牙裔白人。根据多基因风险评分结果,有一名参与者患结直肠癌的风险较高。定性访谈显示了参与者对其结果的理解、对多基因风险评分的信任、对结直肠癌风险的感知、完成结直肠癌筛查的计划、与医疗服务提供者分享多基因风险评分的意愿以及对基因结果影响医疗保健的担忧。

结论

定性分析表明参与者对其多基因风险评分结果感兴趣并理解。需要进一步研究以制定关于使用多基因风险评分进行健康决策的指南、有效的行动呼吁、医疗服务提供者参与方式以及健康教育材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b306/11761838/d5d488a3c14a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b306/11761838/11647d33c718/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b306/11761838/4cf417dbdd7b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b306/11761838/d5d488a3c14a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b306/11761838/11647d33c718/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b306/11761838/4cf417dbdd7b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b306/11761838/d5d488a3c14a/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Perspectives on Personalized Risk Communication Using Polygenic Risk Scores to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions.患者对使用多基因风险评分进行个性化风险沟通以指导结直肠癌筛查决策的看法。
AJPM Focus. 2024 Dec 4;4(1):100308. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100308. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study.基于人群的前瞻性队列研究:东亚常见癌症的多基因风险评分预测。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e82608. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82608.
3
Integrating genome-wide polygenic risk scores and non-genetic risk to predict colorectal cancer diagnosis using UK Biobank data: population based cohort study.利用英国生物库数据整合全基因组多基因风险评分和非遗传风险来预测结直肠癌诊断:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2022 Nov 9;379:e071707. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071707.
4
The role of polygenic risk scores in breast cancer risk perception and decision-making.多基因风险评分在乳腺癌风险认知和决策中的作用。
J Community Genet. 2023 Oct;14(5):489-501. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00655-x. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
5
Crafting Appealing Text Messages to Encourage Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Completion: A Qualitative Study.撰写有吸引力的文本信息以鼓励完成结直肠癌筛查测试:一项定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Nov 4;3(4):e100. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4651.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History.基于多基因风险和家族史的大肠癌个体化筛查的成本效益分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Jan;29(1):10-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1123. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
7
Design and user experience testing of a polygenic score report: a qualitative study of prospective users.多基因风险评分报告的设计和用户体验测试:对潜在用户的定性研究。
BMC Med Genomics. 2021 Oct 1;14(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12920-021-01056-0.
8
Experiences across a genetic screening and testing programme pathway: a qualitative study of mammogram patient perspectives.遗传筛查和检测计划路径中的体验:对乳房 X 光照片患者观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 23;14(10):e089884. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089884.
9
Heuristics Identified in Health Data-Sharing Preferences of Patients With Cancer: Qualitative Focus Group Study.癌症患者健康数据共享偏好中的启发式方法:定性焦点小组研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 17;26:e63155. doi: 10.2196/63155.
10
Screening embryos for polygenic disease risk: a review of epidemiological, clinical, and ethical considerations.胚胎多基因疾病风险筛查:流行病学、临床和伦理考虑的综述。
Hum Reprod Update. 2024 Oct 1;30(5):529-557. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmae012.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes and Experiential Factors Associated with Completion of mt-sDNA Test Kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening.与完成用于结直肠癌筛查的线粒体DNA检测试剂盒相关的态度和体验因素。
J Patient Exp. 2023 Nov 22;10:23743735231213765. doi: 10.1177/23743735231213765. eCollection 2023.
2
Combining Asian and European genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer improves risk prediction across racial and ethnic populations.亚洲和欧洲结直肠癌全基因组关联研究的联合分析提高了不同种族和民族人群的风险预测能力。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 2;14(1):6147. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41819-0.
3
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: Expert Review.
AGA 临床实践更新:结直肠癌筛查和息肉切除术后监测的风险分层:专家综述。
Gastroenterology. 2023 Nov;165(5):1280-1291. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.06.033. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
4
Risk-Stratified Screening for Colorectal Cancer Using Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on Real-World Data.基于真实世界数据的遗传和环境风险因素进行结直肠癌风险分层筛查的成本效果分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Dec;21(13):3415-3423.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
5
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023.2023 年结直肠癌统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 May-Jun;73(3):233-254. doi: 10.3322/caac.21772. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
6
Examining colorectal cancer screening uptake and health provider recommendations among underserved middle aged and older African Americans.调查非洲裔美国中老年弱势群体的结直肠癌筛查接受情况及医疗服务提供者的建议。
Health Promot Perspect. 2022 Dec 31;12(4):399-409. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2022.52. eCollection 2022.
7
Deciphering colorectal cancer genetics through multi-omic analysis of 100,204 cases and 154,587 controls of European and east Asian ancestries.通过对欧洲和东亚血统的 100204 例病例和 154587 例对照进行多组学分析,破解结直肠癌的遗传机制。
Nat Genet. 2023 Jan;55(1):89-99. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01222-9. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
8
Patient and provider perspectives on polygenic risk scores: implications for clinical reporting and utilization.患者和提供者对多基因风险评分的看法:对临床报告和应用的影响。
Genome Med. 2022 Oct 7;14(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01117-8.
9
Persistent Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Tell-Tale Sign for Implementing New Guidelines in Younger Adults.结直肠癌筛查的持续差异:提示在年轻人中实施新指南的重要信号。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Sep 2;31(9):1701-1709. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1330.
10
"A Gift to My Family for Their Future": Attitudes about Genetic Research Participation.“给我家人未来的一份礼物”:对参与基因研究的态度
Public Health Genomics. 2022 May 11:1-10. doi: 10.1159/000524462.