Sports Biomech. 2014 Mar;13(1):75-86. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2013.872287.
The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to determine the barbell load that maximised the system power as well as the ankle, knee, and hip joint powers during the squat jump, and (2) to compare the system powers computed from two different methods: the centre of mass (COM) method and the barbell method. Seven male throwers were recruited in this study. The system power (COM method) and the ankle, knee, and hip joint powers were determined with the load incrementally set at 0%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% of one repetition maximum. The largest system power was observed at the load of 30% (p < 0.008) while the largest ankle and knee powers were observed at 70% and 0% (p < 0.05). The barbell method overestimated the system power (p < 0.001) when compared to the COM method. It was concluded that the barbell method could influence load optimisation in squat jump. The optimal barbell load which maximised the system power did not maximise the ankle, knee, or hip power simultaneously.
(1)确定在深蹲跳中,使系统功率以及踝关节、膝关节和髋关节功率最大化的杠铃负荷;(2)比较两种不同方法(质心(COM)法和杠铃法)计算的系统功率。本研究招募了 7 名男性投掷运动员。通过将负荷逐步增加至 1 次最大重复次数的 0%、10%、30%、50%、70%和 90%,确定了系统功率(COM 法)以及踝关节、膝关节和髋关节的功率。在 30%的负荷下观察到最大的系统功率(p < 0.008),而在 70%和 0%的负荷下观察到最大的踝关节和膝关节功率(p < 0.05)。与 COM 方法相比,杠铃法高估了系统功率(p < 0.001)。结论是杠铃法可能会影响深蹲跳中的负荷优化。使系统功率最大化的最佳杠铃负荷并非同时使踝关节、膝关节或髋关节功率最大化。