Halicioglu Koray, Celikoglu Mevlut, Yavuz Ibrahim, Sekerci Ahmet Ercan, Buyuk Suleyman Kutalmis
Aust Orthod J. 2014 May;30(1):11-8.
The primary purpose was to evaluate condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescent patients displaying unilateral posterior (UCB) and bilateral posterior crossbite (BCB) malocclusions. A secondary aim was to compare the findings with a matched control group exhibiting normal occlusion (CG) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
The study groups consisted of (1) 30 patients (Mean age: 14.49 +/- 1.91 years) with a UCB, (2) 29 patients (Mean age: 14.57 +/- 1.84 years) with a BCB, and (3) 36 patients (Mean age: 14.24 +/- 2.42 years) as a matched control group (CG). Condylar, ramal, condylar-plus-ramal height and index measurements were performed using CBCT images following the method of Habets et al. A paired t-test was performed for side comparison in each group. Oneway ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) was used to determine statistically-significant differences between the groups for asymmetry index measurements and Tukey's HSD test was employed for individual group differences.
There was no statistically significant difference in condylar height (CH), ramal height (RH), and condylar plus ramal height (CH + RH) measurements between the right and left sides of the UCB group and CG, except for the RH in the BCB group (p = 0.045). Tukey's HSD test showed that the ramal asymmetry index (RAI) and the condylar plus the ramal asymmetry index (CRAI) were statistically significantly different between the UCB and BCB groups (p = 0.035 and p = 0.015, respectively).
Although the condylar asymmetry index (CAI) values were found to be high in the groups of UCB (13.84 +/- 11.33), BCB (9.38 +/- 8.56), and CG (10.58 +/- 9.48), the comparisons amongst the groups were not statistically significant. The asymmetry between the UCB and BCB groups was observed for RAI and CRAI values, rather than CAI values.
主要目的是评估患有单侧后牙反合(UCB)和双侧后牙反合(BCB)错牙合畸形的青少年患者的髁突和升支垂直不对称情况。次要目的是使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)将研究结果与咬合正常的匹配对照组(CG)进行比较。
研究组包括:(1)30例UCB患者(平均年龄:14.49±1.91岁),(2)29例BCB患者(平均年龄:14.57±1.84岁),以及(3)36例作为匹配对照组(CG)的患者(平均年龄:14.24±2.42岁)。按照哈贝茨等人的方法,使用CBCT图像进行髁突、升支、髁突加升支高度及指数测量。对每组进行配对t检验以进行左右侧比较。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)来确定组间不对称指数测量的统计学显著差异,并使用图基HSD检验来分析个体组间差异。
除BCB组的升支高度(p = 0.045)外,UCB组和CG组左右两侧的髁突高度(CH)、升支高度(RH)以及髁突加升支高度(CH + RH)测量值之间无统计学显著差异。图基HSD检验显示,UCB组和BCB组之间的升支不对称指数(RAI)以及髁突加升支不对称指数(CRAI)存在统计学显著差异(分别为p = 0.035和p = 0.015)。
尽管在UCB组(13.84±11.33)、BCB组(9.38±8.56)和CG组(10.58±9.48)中发现髁突不对称指数(CAI)值较高,但组间比较无统计学显著差异。UCB组和BCB组之间的不对称性体现在RAI值和CRAI值上,而非CAI值。