Department of Health Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA; Center of Health, Quality, and Economics Research, Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, USA.
Department of Health Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 May 17.
To estimate the cost and health outcomes associated with a new HIV testing strategy that utilizes routine-based clinical reminders.
We conducted an economic analysis of 1) traditional pretest/post-test counseling; 2) counseling and a new clinical reminders system; and 3) only clinical reminder in the veterans' health care system. A payer-perspective decision model was conducted to calculate the 1-year budget impact of three HIV testing strategies. Parameter values were obtained from the literature, including patients' probability of accepting test, and costs associated with HIV testing procedures. Deidentified patient data, including total population screened and number of new HIV cases, were collected from one clinic in Los Angeles, California, from August 2004 to December 2011. Annual total costs and costs per new case were calculated on the basis of parameter values and patient data. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the critical variable on costs.
The total cost of the clinical reminder system with pretest counseling was $81,726 over 1 year compared with $109,208 for traditional HIV testing. Under a clinical reminder system with no pretest counseling, the number of HIV tests performed and the number of new diagnoses increased for that year. In addition, cost per new diagnoses was the lowest.
The clinical reminder system can reduce the cost per cases identified and promote better performance of HIV testing compared with traditional HIV testing. The fundamental decision model can be used for hospital facilities outside the Veteran Affairs adopting a similar program for improving the HIV testing rate.
评估利用常规临床提醒的新 HIV 检测策略相关的成本和健康结果。
我们对以下三种 HIV 检测策略进行了经济分析:1)传统的检测前/后咨询;2)咨询和新的临床提醒系统;3)仅在退伍军人医疗保健系统中使用临床提醒。采用支付者视角的决策模型计算三种 HIV 检测策略的 1 年预算影响。参数值来自文献,包括患者接受检测的概率以及与 HIV 检测程序相关的成本。从加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的一个诊所收集了 2004 年 8 月至 2011 年 12 月的匿名患者数据,包括筛查的总人数和新的 HIV 病例数。根据参数值和患者数据计算了年度总成本和每个新病例的成本。进行敏感性分析以评估关键变量对成本的稳健性。
在 1 年内,带检测前咨询的临床提醒系统总成本为 81726 美元,而传统 HIV 检测为 109208 美元。在没有检测前咨询的临床提醒系统下,当年进行的 HIV 检测次数和新诊断病例数有所增加。此外,每个新诊断病例的成本最低。
与传统 HIV 检测相比,临床提醒系统可以降低每个确诊病例的成本,并促进更好的 HIV 检测性能。基本决策模型可用于退伍军人事务部以外的医院设施,以采用类似方案提高 HIV 检测率。