Murphy Kathy, Cooney Adeline, Casey Dympna
School of Nursing & Midwifery, Aras Moyola, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland.
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 May;3(3):301-15. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.20.
Many governments across Europe and America set maintaining the quality of life (QoL) of older people living in long-term care as a key policy objective; however, much of the evidence reveals that life in many care environments is still routinized and institutionalized. QoL is a term that is widely used but poorly defined and understood. The focus of this Review is on identifying the components of QoL and reviewing strategies for improving QoL in long-term care. Six components of QoL were consistently identified across studies: autonomy, environment, connectedness, meaningful activity, independence and sense of self. A review of strategies for improving QoL revealed that the evidence of effectiveness across studies remains inconclusive. The judgment of quality was often hampered by inadequate details on the study design and the use of nonspecific and wide-ranging QoL tools. Furthermore, high-quality studies are required to determine effectiveness.
欧美许多国家的政府都将维持长期护理机构中老年人的生活质量(QoL)设定为一项关键政策目标;然而,大量证据表明,许多护理环境中的生活仍被常规化和制度化。生活质量是一个被广泛使用但定义和理解都很模糊的术语。本综述的重点是确定生活质量的组成部分,并审视改善长期护理中生活质量的策略。各项研究始终确定了生活质量的六个组成部分:自主性、环境、联系、有意义的活动、独立性和自我意识。对改善生活质量策略的综述表明,各项研究中有关有效性的证据尚无定论。研究设计细节不足以及使用非特异性和范围宽泛的生活质量工具常常妨碍了质量判断。此外,还需要高质量的研究来确定有效性。