Clinical Health Information Management, Fresenius Medical Care North America, Danville, VA.
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2014 Jul;21(4):365-70. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2014.02.014.
The practice of medicine in general and nephrology in particular grows increasingly complex with each passing year. In parallel with this trend, the purchasers of health care are slowly shifting the reimbursement paradigm from one based on rewarding transactions, or work performed, to one that rewards value delivered. Within this context, the health-care value equation is broadly defined as quality divided by costs. Health information technology has been widely recognized as 1 of the foundations for delivering better care at lower costs. As the largest purchaser of health care in the world, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has deployed a series of interrelated programs designed to spur the adoption and utilization of health information technology. This review examines our known collective experience in the practice of nephrology to date with several of these programs and attempts to answer the following question: Is health information technology helping or hindering the delivery of value to the nation's health-care system? Through this review, it was concluded overall that the effect of health information technology appears positive; however, it cannot be objectively determined because of the infancy of its utilization in the practice of medicine.
一般来说,医学实践,尤其是肾脏病学,每年都变得越来越复杂。随着这一趋势的发展,医疗保健的购买者正在慢慢地将报销模式从基于奖励交易或已完成工作的模式转变为奖励所提供价值的模式。在这种情况下,医疗保健价值等式被广泛定义为质量除以成本。医疗信息技术已被广泛认为是提供更好的护理和降低成本的基础之一。作为世界上最大的医疗保健购买者,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心已经部署了一系列相互关联的计划,旨在推动医疗信息技术的采用和利用。这篇综述检查了我们迄今为止在肾脏病学实践中与其中一些计划相关的已知集体经验,并试图回答以下问题:医疗信息技术是否有助于或阻碍向国家医疗保健系统提供价值?通过这篇综述,总的来说,医疗信息技术的效果似乎是积极的;然而,由于其在医学实践中的应用还处于起步阶段,因此无法客观确定。