Plumet Marie-Hélène, Veneziano Edy
LPPS (Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé - EA 4057), Institut de Psychologie, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 71, Avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France,
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Jan;45(1):53-67. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2164-0.
Pragmatic functioning of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) children is rarely examined in socially-meaningful contexts. This study investigates the way oppositional episodes are handled in such contexts by 25 families, 10 with ASD and 15 with typically-developing children. Oppositions occur whenever someone protests, refuses or denies someone else's action, request or statement. The analysis focuses on justifications accounting for the opposition and on their immediate persuasive effect. Analyses of 1,065 oppositional episodes show no differences in justifications among partners and children, except for ASD children with a verbal age 3-4 years, who justify less than their matched controls. The persuasive effect of justifications on children and on partners differs according to their group and verbal age. Implications of the study and future perspectives are discussed.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的实际功能很少在具有社会意义的情境中进行研究。本研究调查了25个家庭在这种情境中处理对立事件的方式,其中10个家庭有自闭症谱系障碍儿童,15个家庭有正常发育儿童。每当有人抗议、拒绝或否认他人的行为、请求或陈述时,就会出现对立情况。分析重点在于对立的理由及其即时说服效果。对1065次对立事件的分析表明,除了语言年龄为3至4岁的自闭症谱系障碍儿童比匹配的对照组给出的理由更少外,伙伴和儿童之间在理由方面没有差异。理由对儿童和伙伴的说服效果因他们所属的群体和语言年龄而异。本文讨论了该研究的意义及未来展望。