Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Aug;41(8):1097-112. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1131-7.
We examined processing of verbal irony in three groups of children: (1) 18 children with high-functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder (HFASD), (2) 18 typically- developing children, matched to the first group for verbal ability, and (3) 18 typically-developing children matched to the first group for chronological age. We utilized an irony comprehension task that minimized verbal and pragmatic demands for participants. Results showed that children with HFASD were as accurate as typicallydeveloping children in judging speaker intent for ironic criticisms, but group differences in judgment latencies, eye gaze, and humor evaluations suggested that children with HFASD applied a different processing strategy for irony comprehension; one that resulted in less accurate appreciation of the social functions of irony.
(1)18 名高功能自闭症谱系障碍(HFASD)儿童,(2)18 名言语能力与第一组匹配的典型发育儿童,以及(3)18 名与第一组年龄匹配的典型发育儿童。我们利用了一种反讽理解任务,该任务最大限度地减少了参与者在言语和语用方面的要求。结果表明,HFASD 儿童在判断讽刺批评的说话者意图时与典型发育儿童一样准确,但在判断潜伏期、眼球注视和幽默评价方面的组间差异表明,HFASD 儿童对反讽理解采用了不同的加工策略;一种导致对反讽的社会功能的欣赏不太准确的策略。