Department of Communication U-1085,University of Connecticut,Storrs,CT
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):308-9. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13002525.
This commentary advances the hypothesis that differences between liberal and conservative orientations noted in the target article are emotional in nature and caused by differences in attachment security: Conservatives are more vigilant to negative features of the environment because of a general sense of insecurity, whereas liberals are relatively more secure.
本评论提出了一个假设,即目标文章中指出的自由派和保守派取向之间的差异本质上是情感上的,是由依恋安全性的差异引起的:由于普遍的不安全感,保守派对环境的负面特征更为警惕,而自由派则相对更安全。