Department of Psychology,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):319-20. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13002641.
Many of the characteristics cited in Hibbing et al.'s account are ineffective predictors of economic conservatism. However, these same characteristics are often associated with differences not only in social conservatism but also in religiousness and authoritarianism. Hibbing et al. may have offered a useful explanation of traditionalism and attitudes toward change across domains rather than of general political attitudes.
许多在 Hibbing 等人的报告中提到的特征并不能有效地预测经济保守主义。然而,这些相同的特征往往与社会保守主义的差异有关,也与宗教信仰和威权主义有关。Hibbing 等人可能提供了一个有用的解释,即传统主义和对不同领域变化的态度,而不是对一般政治态度的解释。