Suppr超能文献

一项关于Optive Plus(®)治疗干眼症患者的前瞻性、多中心、非干预性研究:亲脂性研究

A prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study of Optive Plus(®) in the treatment of patients with dry eye: the prolipid study.

作者信息

Kaercher Thomas, Thelen Ulrich, Brief Gerrett, Morgan-Warren Robert J, Leaback Richard

机构信息

Augenarztpraxis, Heidelberg, Germany.

University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun 17;8:1147-55. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S58464. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of Optive Plus(®), an artificial tear containing castor oil, in patients with dry eye, in a routine clinical setting.

METHODS

This was a prospective, noninterventional study of patients with dry eye who switched from a prior therapy or who were naïve to treatment (n=1,209). Patients were issued Optive Plus(®) artificial tears. Dry eye severity, tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer score, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score, and patient assessment of symptoms were recorded at baseline and at the follow-up visit (4 weeks after starting Optive Plus(®)).

RESULTS

The cause of dry eye was determined to be aqueous deficiency, lipid deficiency, or a mixture of aqueous and lipid deficiency (in 19.5%, 20.1%, and 47.8%, respectively, of the total study population). The severity of dry eye decreased from baseline to the follow-up visit, showing a decrease of the more severe levels (2-4) and a concurrent increase in mild level (1) of the rating scale. Patients reported an improvement in dry eye symptoms over the duration of the study, specifically 74.2% (n=152), 85.4% (n=182), and 82.4% (n=417) of patients in the aqueous-deficient, lipid-deficient, and mixed-deficiency groups, respectively. TBUT was measured in 475 patients. Baseline measurements for mean and standard deviation were 9.0±3.5, 7.1±3.6, and 6.6±3.0 seconds for the aqueous-deficient, lipid-deficient, and mixed-deficiency groups, respectively. These increased to 10.5±3.5, 10.0±3.6, and 9.2±3.1 seconds at the final visit. Overall, 92.5% of all patients were satisfied with the use of Optive Plus(®), and 86% said they would purchase Optive Plus(®). Ten percent of patients reported adverse events, and 1.8% of all patients experienced treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Optive Plus(®) was well tolerated and effective in reducing the signs and symptoms of all types of dry eye but is recommended for lipid-deficient dry eye patients.

摘要

目的

旨在评估含蓖麻油的人工泪液Optive Plus(®)在常规临床环境中对干眼症患者的疗效。

方法

这是一项对从先前治疗转换过来或未接受过治疗的干眼症患者(n = 1209)进行的前瞻性、非干预性研究。为患者发放Optive Plus(®)人工泪液。在基线和随访时(开始使用Optive Plus(®) 4周后)记录干眼严重程度、泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、泪液分泌试验评分、眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评分以及患者症状评估情况。

结果

干眼的病因确定为水样液缺乏、脂质缺乏或水样液与脂质混合缺乏(分别占总研究人群的19.5%、20.1%和47.8%)。从基线到随访,干眼严重程度降低,评级量表中较严重级别(2 - 4级)减少,轻度级别(1级)同时增加。在研究期间,患者报告干眼症状有所改善,具体而言,水样液缺乏组、脂质缺乏组和混合缺乏组分别有74.2%(n = 152)、85.4%(n = 182)和82.4%(n = 417)的患者症状改善。对475例患者测量了TBUT。水样液缺乏组、脂质缺乏组和混合缺乏组的基线平均测量值及标准差分别为9.0±3.5秒、7.1±3.6秒和6.6±3.0秒。在最后一次随访时,这些值分别增加到10.5±3.5秒、10.0±3.6秒和9.2±3.1秒。总体而言,92.5%的患者对使用Optive Plus(®)感到满意,86%的患者表示会购买Optive Plus(®)。10%的患者报告了不良事件,所有患者中有1.8%经历了与治疗相关的不良事件。

结论

Optive Plus(®)耐受性良好,对减轻各类干眼症的体征和症状有效,但推荐用于脂质缺乏型干眼症患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeac/4069146/9266fb6ab9ec/opth-8-1147Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验