Suppr超能文献

比较EX-PRESS植入术与小梁切除术治疗开角型青光眼的随机对照试验的Meta分析。

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing EX-PRESS implantation with trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma.

作者信息

Wang Wei, Zhang Xiulan

机构信息

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jun 27;9(6):e100578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100578. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EX-PRESS implantation compared with trabeculectomy for uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

Pertinent randomized controlled trials were identified through systematic searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The efficacy measures utilized were the weighted mean differences (WMDs) for the intraocular pressure reduction (IOPR), the reduction in glaucoma medications, the change of visual acuity, and the relative risks (RRs) for operative success rates. The safety measures utilized were RRs for postoperative complications. The pooled effects were calculated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials of 292 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. The WMDs of the IOPR comparing the EX-PRESS with trabeculectomy were -0.25 (95% Cl: -3.61 to 3.11) at 6 month, 0.053 (-4.31 to 4.42) at 12 months, 0.81 (-4.06 to 5.67) at 24 months, and 0.20 (-2.11 to 2.51) at final follow-up. There was no statistically significance for IOPR at any point after surgery. There were also no significant differences in the reduction in glaucoma medications or visual acuity between the groups. The pooled relative risks comparing EX-PRESS with Trabeculectomy were 1.36 (1.11 to 1.66) for the complete operative success rate and 1.05 (0.94 to 1.17) for the qualified operative success rate. EX-PRESS and Trabeculectomy were associated with similar incidences in most complications with the exception of hyphema, with pooled RR being 0.18 (0.046 to 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

EX-PRESS implantation and trabeculectomy have similar efficacy in IOP-lowering, medication reduction, vision recovery, and qualified operative success rates. EX-PRESS associated with higher rates of complete operative success and fewer hyphema than with Trabeculectomy. However, these should be interpreted with caution because of the inherent limitations of the included studies.

摘要

目的

评估EX-PRESS植入术与小梁切除术治疗未控制的开角型青光眼的疗效和安全性。

方法

通过系统检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆确定相关随机对照试验。所采用的疗效指标为眼压降低(IOPR)的加权平均差(WMDs)、青光眼药物使用量的减少、视力变化以及手术成功率的相对风险(RRs)。所采用的安全性指标为术后并发症的RRs。采用随机效应模型计算合并效应。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了4项涉及292只眼的随机对照试验。EX-PRESS与小梁切除术相比,6个月时IOPR的WMD为-0.25(95%CI:-3.61至3.11),12个月时为0.053(-4.31至4.42),24个月时为0.81(-4.06至5.67),最终随访时为0.20(-2.11至2.51)。术后任何时间点的IOPR均无统计学意义。两组间青光眼药物使用量的减少或视力变化也无显著差异。EX-PRESS与小梁切除术相比,完全手术成功率的合并相对风险为1.36(1.11至1.66),合格手术成功率的合并相对风险为1.05(0.94至1.17)。除前房积血外,EX-PRESS和小梁切除术在大多数并发症中的发生率相似,合并RR为0.18(0.046至0.66)。

结论

EX-PRESS植入术和小梁切除术在降低眼压、减少药物使用、视力恢复和合格手术成功率方面具有相似的疗效。EX-PRESS与小梁切除术相比,完全手术成功率更高,前房积血更少。然而,由于纳入研究的固有局限性,这些结果应谨慎解读。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbed/4074054/45cf5c1a7881/pone.0100578.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验