• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EX-PRESS 与小梁切除术治疗后视力恢复的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的结果。

Comparison of visual recovery following ex-PRESS versus trabeculectomy: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

*Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto †Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto §Department of Ophthalmology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada ‡Department of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2015 Mar;24(3):181-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829e1b68.

DOI:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829e1b68
PMID:23807352
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the rate of visual recovery after Ex-PRESS implantation versus standard trabeculectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing Ex-PRESS to trabeculectomy were analyzed for postoperative changes in visual acuity (VA). Risk factors for visual loss (split fixation, cup-disc ratio, intraocular pressure, visual field mean deviation, and hypotony) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-four subjects were enrolled (33 Ex-PRESS, 31 trabeculectomy). There was no significant difference in mean logMAR VA between groups at baseline or any study visit. VA was significantly reduced up to week 2 following surgery in both the groups. However, by month 1, VA in the Ex-PRESS group was no longer significantly different from baseline (P=0.23) and remained nonsignificant at subsequent visits up to 6 months. In the trabeculectomy group, VA remained significantly lower than baseline at each study visit. At 6 months, 47% of the trabeculectomy eyes compared with 16% of the Ex-PRESS eyes had lost ≥2 Snellen lines (P=0.01). Reasons for VA loss included cataract, central retinal vein occlusion, and diabetic retinopathy, however, in a significant number of cases no cause could be determined. None of the risk factors evaluated were associated with vision loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no difference in mean VA between the Ex-PRESS and trabeculectomy groups at any time point, trabeculectomy eyes were more likely to lose ≥2 Snellen lines. In addition, VA recovered faster in the Ex-PRESS group.

摘要

目的

比较 Ex-PRESS 植入术后与标准小梁切除术的视力恢复率。

方法

对一项前瞻性随机对照试验中接受 Ex-PRESS 与小梁切除术的患者进行分析,以评估术后视力变化。评估了导致视力丧失的风险因素(裂孔性固视、杯盘比、眼内压、视野平均偏差和低眼压)。

结果

共纳入 64 例患者(33 例 Ex-PRESS,31 例小梁切除术)。两组基线或任何研究访视点的平均对数视力均无显著差异。两组术后 2 周内视力均明显下降。然而,在 Ex-PRESS 组,术后 1 个月时视力已不再显著低于基线(P=0.23),并且在随后的 6 个月访视点上仍无显著差异。在小梁切除术组,每个研究访视点的视力仍明显低于基线。在 6 个月时,与 Ex-PRESS 组相比,47%的小梁切除术眼失去了≥2 行 Snellen 视力(P=0.01)。视力丧失的原因包括白内障、视网膜中央静脉阻塞和糖尿病性视网膜病变,但在许多情况下无法确定原因。评估的风险因素均与视力丧失无关。

结论

尽管在任何时间点 Ex-PRESS 和小梁切除术组的平均视力均无差异,但小梁切除术眼更有可能失去≥2 行 Snellen 视力。此外,Ex-PRESS 组的视力恢复更快。

相似文献

1
Comparison of visual recovery following ex-PRESS versus trabeculectomy: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial.EX-PRESS 与小梁切除术治疗后视力恢复的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的结果。
J Glaucoma. 2015 Mar;24(3):181-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829e1b68.
2
Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Ex-PRESS to Trabeculectomy: 1-Year Results.比较Ex-PRESS与小梁切除术的前瞻性随机研究:1年结果
J Glaucoma. 2015 Oct-Nov;24(8):624-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000029.
3
Randomized, prospective, comparative trial of EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device versus trabeculectomy (XVT study).EX-PRESS 青光眼引流器与小梁切除术的随机、前瞻性、对照临床试验(XVT 研究)。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;157(2):433-440.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
4
Comparison of trabeculectomy versus Ex-PRESS: 3-year follow-up.小梁切除术与Ex-PRESS手术的比较:3年随访
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;100(9):1269-73. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307161. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
5
Visual acuity and corneal higher-order aberrations after EX-PRESS or trabeculectomy, and the determination of associated factors that influence visual function.EX-PRESS青光眼引流器植入术或小梁切除术后的视力和角膜高阶像差,以及影响视觉功能相关因素的判定
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;38(5):1969-1976. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0685-1. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
6
Comparison of trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS implantation in fellow eyes of the same patient: a prospective, randomised study.同一患者对侧眼行小梁切除术与 Ex-PRESS 植入术的比较:一项前瞻性、随机研究。
Eye (Lond). 2012 May;26(5):703-10. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.13. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
7
The Ex-PRESS glaucoma shunt versus trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma: a prospective randomized study.Ex-PRESS 青光眼引流阀与小梁切除术治疗开角型青光眼:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Adv Ther. 2009 Mar;26(3):336-45. doi: 10.1007/s12325-009-0017-6. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
8
Trabeculectomy Versus EX-PRESS Shunt Versus Ahmed Valve Implant: Short-term Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells.小梁切除术与EX-PRESS分流术及艾哈迈德人工房水引流阀植入术:对角膜内皮细胞的短期影响
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;160(6):1185-1190.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.08.022. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
9
Trabeculectomy Versus Ex-Press Glaucoma Filtration Device in Silicomacrophagocytic Open Angle Glaucoma Secondary to Silicone Oil Emulsification.小梁切除术与Ex-Press青光眼滤过装置治疗硅油乳化继发硅巨噬细胞性开角型青光眼的对比
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr-Jun;23(2):177-82. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.175889.
10
Comparison of trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under scleral flap.小梁切除术与巩膜瓣下植入Ex-PRESS微型青光眼引流器的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2007 Jan;16(1):14-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000243479.90403.cd.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of changes in retinal light sensitivity thresholds in the early postoperative days after trabeculectomy using microperimetry.使用微视野计评估小梁切除术后早期视网膜光敏感度阈值的变化。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2025 May;69(3):432-441. doi: 10.1007/s10384-025-01186-3. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
Ex-PRESS Implantation versus Trabeculectomy for Long-Term Maintenance in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma.前房穿刺植入术与小梁切除术治疗开角型青光眼患者的长期维持疗效比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 28;17:2525-2537. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S419765. eCollection 2023.
3
Contributing factors for intraocular pressure control in patients with mostly normal-tension glaucoma after initial Ex-PRESS drainage device implantation.
初发正常眼压性青光眼患者行 Ex-PRESS 引流器植入术后眼压控制的影响因素。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan;262(1):191-201. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06209-8. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
4
Corneal endothelial cell loss after EX-PRESS surgery depends on site of insertion, cornea or trabecular meshwork.EX-PRESS手术术后角膜内皮细胞损失取决于植入部位,即角膜或小梁网。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;43(10):3471-3477. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02752-9. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
5
Early postoperative visual acuity changes after trabeculectomy and factors affecting visual acuity.术后早期小梁切除术后视力变化及影响视力的因素。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;261(9):2611-2623. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06076-3. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
6
Device-modified trabeculectomy for glaucoma.器械改良小梁切除术治疗青光眼。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 13;3(3):CD010472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010472.pub3.
7
Comparison of the results of Ex-PRESS surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma between high and low preoperative intraocular pressure.高术前眼压与低术前眼压原发性开角型青光眼患者 Ex-PRESS 手术结果的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;43(8):2803-2809. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02678-2. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
8
Ex-PRESS® surgery versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma with low preoperative intraocular pressure.EX-PRESS 引流阀植入术与小梁切除术治疗低术前眼压的原发性开角型青光眼。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov;42(11):3367-3375. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02335-0. Epub 2022 May 10.
9
Conventional glaucoma implants and the new MIGS devices: a comprehensive review of current options and future directions.传统青光眼植入物和新型 MIGS 设备:当前选择和未来方向的综合综述。
Eye (Lond). 2021 Dec;35(12):3202-3221. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01595-x. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
10
An Ex-Press implant versus trabeculectomy in a fibrotic bleb with late failure after previous trabeculectomy.曾接受小梁切除术且出现晚期失败的纤维化滤过泡患者中,使用Ex-Press植入物与小梁切除术的对比研究
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 18;14(3):383-387. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.03.08. eCollection 2021.