Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎继发 TNF 治疗应答不佳的患者转换使用培塞利珠单抗后可获得有效且安全的应答:一项 IV 期、随机、多中心、双盲、为期 12 周的研究,随后是为期 12 周的开放标签期。

Rheumatoid arthritis secondary non-responders to TNF can attain an efficacious and safe response by switching to certolizumab pegol: a phase IV, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, 12-week study, followed by a 12-week open-label phase.

机构信息

University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.

Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Rehabilitation, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Dec;73(12):2174-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205325. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had discontinued an initially effective TNF inhibitor (TNF-IR).

METHODS

A randomised 12-week double-blind trial with CZP (n=27) or placebo (n=10) followed by an open-label 12 week extension period with CZP.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. ACR20 response (primary end point) at week 12 was achieved in 61.5%, and none of CZP and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Weeks 12-24 showed a maximum effect for CZP at 12 weeks, and that placebo patients switched blindly to CZP attained similar results seen with CZP in weeks 0-12. Since this result was highly significant, study inclusion was terminated after entry of 33.6% of the originally planned 102 patients. Adverse events occurred in 16/27 (59.3%) CZP subjects and 4/10 (40%) placebo subjects. There were no serious adverse events, neoplasms, opportunistic, or serious infections.

CONCLUSIONS

This first, prospective, blinded trial of CZP in secondary TNF-IR shows that the ACR20 response rate observed with CZP was higher than that reported in most previous studies of TNF-IR. Additionally, CZP demonstrated good safety and tolerability. This study supports the use of CZP in RA patients who are secondary non-responders to anti-TNF therapies.

摘要

目的

研究培塞利珠单抗(CZP)在初始有效肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNF-IR)治疗失败的活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项随机、双盲、为期 12 周的临床试验,患者接受 CZP(n=27)或安慰剂(n=10)治疗,随后进入为期 12 周的开放标签扩展期,继续接受 CZP 治疗。

结果

两组患者的基线特征相似。第 12 周时,ACR20 应答(主要终点)在 CZP 组为 61.5%,在安慰剂组为 0%。第 12-24 周时,CZP 组在第 12 周时达到最大疗效,而盲法转换为 CZP 治疗的安慰剂组患者则取得了与第 0-12 周时 CZP 组相似的结果。由于这一结果具有高度显著性,在最初计划纳入的 102 例患者中,仅入组了 33.6%时即终止了研究。在 CZP 组中,16/27(59.3%)例患者和安慰剂组中 4/10(40%)例患者出现不良反应。无严重不良事件、肿瘤、机会性或严重感染。

结论

这是 CZP 在继发于 TNF-IR 的患者中的首次前瞻性、双盲临床试验,结果显示 CZP 的 ACR20 应答率高于大多数先前 TNF-IR 研究的报道。此外,CZP 显示出良好的安全性和耐受性。这项研究支持在抗 TNF 治疗失败的 RA 患者中使用 CZP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验